Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022930›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Comparative efficacy of a single-session "Empowered Relief" videoconference-delivered group intervention for chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Maisa S Ziadni, Steven R Anderson, Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro, Beth D Darnall

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04546685 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a 1-Session Spanish "Empowered Relief" Videoconference-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsChronic PainArmsUsual Care, Empowered Relief
NCT05057988 nacompletednot on this map

Virtual Empowered Relief for People With Chronic Pain Who Take Methadone or Buprenorphine

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled73ConditionsChronic Pain, PainArmsEmpowered Relief class
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychological Treatment for Chronic Pain: Improving Access and Integration.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maisa S ZiadniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. mziadni@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-0646
Steven R AndersonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Lluvia Gonzalez-CastroDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Beth D DarnallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.

Funding

Single Session Pain Catastrophizing Class: Efficacy & Mechanisms for Reducing Opioid Use Among Chronic Pain PatientsK23DA047473 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZIADNI, MAISA · 2019 to 2023
$796k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA047473NIDA NIH HHS NIH K23DA047473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain is naturally aversive and often distressing for patients. Pain coping and self-regulatory skills have been shown to effectively reduce pain-related distress and other symptoms. In this trial, the primary goal is to pilot test the comparative efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class to a waitlist control among patients with chronic pain.

methodsOur study is a randomized clinical trial pilot testing the superiority of our 2-h single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class against a waitlist control. We will enroll 120 adult patients with mixed etiology chronic pain and randomize 1:1 to one of the two study arms. We hypothesize superiority for the pain education class for bolstering pain and symptom management. Team researchers masked to treatment assignment will assess the outcomes up to 3 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION: This study aims to test the utility of a single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class to improve self-regulation of pain and pain-related outcomes. Findings from our project have the potential to significantly reduce barriers to effective psychological treatment for pain, optimizing the delivery of increasingly vital online and remote-delivered intervention options.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04546685 . Registered on 04 September 2020.

Indexed as

Chronic PainAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVideoconferencingChronic painCognitive-behavioral therapyPain educationRandomized controlled trialSingle-session interventionSymptom managementTreatmentVideoconference-delivered

Identifiers

PMID34022930
PMCPMC8140415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.