ArticleMalaria journal2021
Microbiota identified from preserved Anopheles.
Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Reinventing malaria control: hierarchical intervention strategies for African settings based on the microbiota-barrier-innate immunity axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Environmental persistence and transmission dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Evidence of microbiome contribution to the escalation of pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles funestus s.s.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Identification of anFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Large-scale genomic analysis of Elizabethkingia anophelis.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- MALDI-TOF MS Profiling and Its Contribution to Mosquito-Borne Diseases: A Systematic Review.Insects · 2024Review
- Multi-omics analysis of antiviral interactions of Elizabethkingia anophelis and Zika virus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Marked Effects of Larval Salt Exposure on the Life History and Gut Microbiota of the Malaria VectorInsects · 2022Article
- A symbiotic gut bacterium enhances Aedes albopictus resistance to insecticide.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- The dynamic gut microbiota of zoophilic members of the Anopheles gambiae complex (Diptera: Culicidae).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Malaria-Transmitting Vectors Microbiota: Overview and Interactions WithFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Microbiota Variation Across Life Stages of European Field-CaughtFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMosquito species from the Anopheles gambiae complex and the Anopheles funestus group are dominant African malaria vectors. Mosquito microbiota play vital roles in physiology and vector competence. Recent research has focused on investigating the mosquito microbiota, especially in wild populations. Wild mosquitoes are preserved and transported to a laboratory for analyses. Thus far, microbial characterization post-preservation has been investigated in only Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens. Investigating the efficacy of cost-effective preservatives has also been limited to AllProtect reagent, ethanol and nucleic acid preservation buffer. This study characterized the microbiota of African Anopheles vectors: Anopheles arabiensis (member of the An. gambiae complex) and An. funestus (member of the An. funestus group), preserved on silica desiccant and RNAlater
methodsMicrobial composition and diversity were characterized using culture-dependent (midgut dissections, culturomics, MALDI-TOF MS) and culture-independent techniques (abdominal dissections, DNA extraction, next-generation sequencing) from laboratory (colonized) and field-collected mosquitoes. Colonized mosquitoes were either fresh (non-preserved) or preserved for 4 and 12 weeks on silica or in RNAlater
resultsElizabethkingia anophelis and Serratia oryzae were common between both vector species, while Enterobacter cloacae and Staphylococcus epidermidis were specific to females and males, respectively. Microbial diversity was not influenced by sex, condition (fresh or preserved), preservative, or preservation time-period; however, the type of bacterial identification technique affected all microbial diversity indices.
conclusionsThis study broadly characterized the microbiota of An. arabiensis and An. funestus. Silica- and RNAlater
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.