Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022829›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2021

Time controlled adaptive ventilation™ as conservative treatment of destroyed lung: an alternative to lung transplantation.

Malou Janssen, J Han J Meeder, Leonard Seghers, Corstiaan A den Uil

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malou JanssenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, Room Rg 626, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.janssen.1@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-2532
J Han J MeederDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, Room Rg 626, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leonard SeghersDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Transplant Center, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Corstiaan A den UilDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, Room Rg 626, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often requires controlled ventilation, yielding high mechanical power and possibly further injury. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) can be used as a bridge to recovery, however, if this fails the end result is destroyed lung parenchyma. This condition is fatal and the only remaining alternative is lung transplantation. In the case study presented in this paper, lung transplantation was not an option given the critically ill state and the presence of HLA antibodies. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) may be valuable in ARDS, but APRV settings recommended in various patient and clinical studies are inconsistent. The Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation (TCAV™) method is the most studied technique to set and adjust the APRV mode and uses an extended continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Phase in combination with a very brief Release Phase. In addition, the TCAV™ method settings are personalized and adaptive based on changes in lung pathophysiology. We used the TCAV™ method in a case of severe ARDS, which enabled us to open, stabilize and slowly heal the severely damaged lung parenchyma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old woman presented with Staphylococcus Aureus necrotizing pneumonia. Progressive respiratory failure necessitated invasive mechanical ventilation and VV-ECMO. Mechanical ventilation (MV) was ultimately discontinued because lung protective settings resulted in trivial tidal volumes. She was referred to our academic transplant center for bilateral lung transplantation after the remaining infection had been cleared. We initiated the TCAV™ method in order to stabilize the lung parenchyma and to promote tissue recovery. This strategy was challenged by the presence of a large bronchopleural fistula, however, APRV enabled weaning from VV-ECMO and mechanical ventilation. After two months, following nearly complete surgical closure of the remaining bronchopleural fistulas, the patient was readmitted to ICU where she had early postoperative complications. Since other ventilation modes resulted in significant atelectasis and hypercapnia, APRV was restarted. The patient was then again weaned from MV.

conclusionsThe TCAV™ method can be useful to wean challenging patients with severe ARDS and might contribute to lung recovery. In this particular case, a lung transplantation was circumvented.

Indexed as

AdultConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansLungLung TransplantationPneumonia, BacterialRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeTidal VolumeAcute respiratory distress syndromeBronchopleural fistulaDestroyed lungLung protective ventilationTime-controlled adaptive ventilationVeno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID34022829
PMCPMC8140588
OpenAlexW3164391490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.