Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022787›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Segmentor: a tool for manual refinement of 3D microscopy annotations.

David Borland, Carolyn M McCormick, Niyanta K Patel, Oleh Krupa, Jessica T Mory, Alvaro A Beltran, Tala M Farah, Carla F Escobar-Tomlienovich, Sydney S Olson, Minjeong Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David BorlandRENCI, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Europa Drive, Suite 540, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA.
Carolyn M McCormickUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Niyanta K PatelUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Oleh KrupaUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Jessica T MoryUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Alvaro A BeltranUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Tala M FarahUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Carla F Escobar-TomlienovichUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Sydney S OlsonUNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Minjeong KimDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA.
Guorong Wu *Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 334 Emergency Room Drive, 343 Medical Wing C, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. grwu@med.unc.edu.
Jason L Stein *UNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB# 7250, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. jason_stein@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4829-0513

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNC Neuroscience Center Research Cores: MicroscopyP30NS045892 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZYLKA, MARK J. · 2003 to 2022
$11.5M
The influence of common genetic variation on brain overgrowth pathwaysR01MH120125 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
pathQTL: Integrative Multi-Omics Causal Inference of Molecular Mechanisms Leading to Neuropsychiatric IllnessR01MH118349 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LOVE, MICHAEL ISAIAH, STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Quantifying the developmental trajectory of autism-associated brain overgrowth using 3D cellular resolution imagingR01MH121433 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
A Scalable Platform for Exploring and Analyzing Whole Brain Tissue Cleared ImagesR01NS110791 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, GUORONG · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIH HHS R01MH118349NIH HHS R01MH120125NIH HHS R01MH121433NIH HHS R01NS110791NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118349NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120125NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121433NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS045892NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in tissue clearing techniques, combined with high-speed image acquisition through light sheet microscopy, enable rapid three-dimensional (3D) imaging of biological specimens, such as whole mouse brains, in a matter of hours. Quantitative analysis of such 3D images can help us understand how changes in brain structure lead to differences in behavior or cognition, but distinguishing densely packed features of interest, such as nuclei, from background can be challenging. Recent deep learning-based nuclear segmentation algorithms show great promise for automated segmentation, but require large numbers of accurate manually labeled nuclei as training data.

resultsWe present Segmentor, an open-source tool for reliable, efficient, and user-friendly manual annotation and refinement of objects (e.g., nuclei) within 3D light sheet microscopy images. Segmentor employs a hybrid 2D-3D approach for visualizing and segmenting objects and contains features for automatic region splitting, designed specifically for streamlining the process of 3D segmentation of nuclei. We show that editing simultaneously in 2D and 3D using Segmentor significantly decreases time spent on manual annotations without affecting accuracy as compared to editing the same set of images with only 2D capabilities.

conclusionsSegmentor is a tool for increased efficiency of manual annotation and refinement of 3D objects that can be used to train deep learning segmentation algorithms, and is available at https://www.nucleininja.org/ and https://github.com/RENCI/Segmentor .

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyAlgorithmsAnimalsBrainImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceDeep learningImage segmentationLight sheet microscopyManual annotationTissue clearing

Identifiers

PMID34022787
PMCPMC8141214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.