Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022261›Full record

ArticleUrology2021

Video Visits are Practical for the Follow-up and Management of Established Male Infertility Patients.

Juan Andino, Alex Zhu, Zoey Chopra, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Chad Ellimoottil, James M Dupree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reimagining Ambulatory Care in Urology: Conversion of the Urology Clinic into a Procedure Center Improves Patient's Experience.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient perspectives of telehealth for fertility care: a national survey.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan AndinoMichigan Medicine Department of Urology, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: juanjose@med.umich.edu.
Alex ZhuMichigan Medicine Department of Urology, Ann Arbor, MI.
Zoey ChopraUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Stephanie Daignault-NewtonMichigan Medicine Department of Urology, Ann Arbor, MI.
Chad EllimoottilMichigan Medicine Department of Urology, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI.
James M DupreeMichigan Medicine Department of Urology, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

Improving Video Visit Adoption by SurgeonsK08HS027632 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLIMOOTTIL, CHANDY SKARIA · 2020 to 2024
$775k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS027632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the use of video visits for male infertility care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic

methodsWe reviewed video visits for male infertility patients completed at a tertiary academic center in southeast Michigan. These patients had follow-up after an initial in-person evaluation. We designed this retrospective case series to describe the diagnostic categories seen through telehealth, management steps completed during video visits, and to understand whether additional in-person care was required within 90 days of video visits. In addition, we estimated time and cost savings for patients attributed to video visits.

resultsMost men seen during video visits had an endocrinologic (29%) or anatomic (21%) cause for their infertility. 73% of video visits involved reviewing results; 30% included counseling regarding assistive reproductive technologies; and 25% of video visits resulted in prescribing hormonally active medications. The two patients (3%) who were seen in clinic after their video visit underwent a varicocelectomy in the interim. No patients required an unplanned in-person visit. From a patient perspective, video visits were estimated to save a median of 97 minutes (IQR 64-250) of travel per visit. Median cost savings per patient- by avoiding travel and taking time off work for a clinic visit-were estimated to range from $149 (half day off) to $252 (full day off).

conclusionVideo visits for established male infertility patients were used to manage different causes of infertility while saving patients time and money. Telehealth for established patients did not trigger additional in-person evaluations.

Indexed as

Infertility, MaleRemote ConsultationAcademic Medical CentersAdultCost SavingsHumansMaleMichiganMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34022261
PMCPMC9752825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.