Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022237›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Local actin dynamics couple speed and persistence in a cellular Potts model of cell migration.

Inge M N Wortel, Ioana Niculescu, P Martijn Kolijn, Nir S Gov, Rob J de Boer, Johannes Textor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physical models of embryonic epithelial healing.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Review
  4. cPLAScience advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Making the cut: Multiscale simulation of membrane remodeling.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SEMAPL bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mesenchymal Migration on Adhesive-Nonadhesive Alternate Surfaces in Macrophages.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inge M N WortelDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Data Science, Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: inge.wortel@ru.nl.
Ioana NiculescuTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
P Martijn KolijnTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nir S GovDepartment of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Rob J de BoerTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johannes TextorDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Data Science, Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: johannes.textor@ru.nl.
Utrecht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is astoundingly diverse. Molecular signatures, cell-cell interactions, and environmental structures each play their part in shaping cell motion, yielding numerous morphologies and migration modes. Nevertheless, in recent years, a simple unifying law was found to describe cell migration across many different cell types and contexts: faster cells turn less frequently. This universal coupling between speed and persistence (UCSP) was explained by retrograde actin flow from front to back, but it remains unclear how this mechanism generalizes to cells with complex shapes and cells migrating in structured environments, which may not have a well-defined front-to-back orientation. Here, we present an in-depth characterization of an existing cellular Potts model, in which cells polarize dynamically from a combination of local actin dynamics (stimulating protrusions) and global membrane tension along the perimeter (inhibiting protrusions). We first show that the UCSP emerges spontaneously in this model through a cross talk of intracellular mechanisms, cell shape, and environmental constraints, resembling the dynamic nature of cell migration in vivo. Importantly, we find that local protrusion dynamics suffice to reproduce the UCSP-even in cases in which no clear global, front-to-back polarity exists. We then harness the spatial nature of the cellular Potts model to show how cell shape dynamics limit both the speed and persistence a cell can reach and how a rigid environment such as the skin can restrict cell motility even further. Our results broaden the range of potential mechanisms underlying the speed-persistence coupling that has emerged as a fundamental property of migrating cells.

Indexed as

ActinsCytoskeletonCell MovementCell ShapeKeratinocytesActins

Identifiers

PMID34022237
PMCPMC8390880
OpenAlexW3160630995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.