Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022065›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

Challenges in migrant women's maternity care in a high-income country: A population-based cohort study of maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Embla Ýr Guðmundsdóttir, Helga Gottfreðsdóttir, Berglind Hálfdánsdóttir, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze, Mika Gissler, Kristjana Einarsdóttir

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Obstetric Complications in Women from Sub-Saharan Africa-A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Embla Ýr GuðmundsdóttirDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9967-1442
Helga GottfreðsdóttirDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Berglind HálfdánsdóttirDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Marianne NieuwenhuijzeResearch Center for Midwifery Science, Academie Verloskunde Maastricht, Zuyd, the Netherlands.
Mika GisslerInformation Services Department, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristjana EinarsdóttirCenter of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-7650
University of Iceland · ISMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

The Icelandic Research Fund 196218-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to explore maternal and perinatal outcomes of migrant women in Iceland. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis prospective population-based cohort study included women who gave birth to a singleton in Iceland between 1997 and 2018, comprising a total of 92 403 births. Migrant women were defined as women with citizenship other than Icelandic, including refugees and asylum seekers, and categorized into three groups, based on their country of citizenship Human Development Index score. The effect of country of citizenship was estimated. The main outcome measures were onset of labor, augmentation, epidural, perineum support, episiotomy, mode of birth, obstetric anal sphincter injury, postpartum hemorrhage, preterm birth, a 5-minute Apgar <7, neonatal intensive care unit admission and perinatal mortality. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for maternal and perinatal outcomes were calculated using logistic regression models.

resultsA total of 8158 migrant women gave birth during the study period: 4401 primiparous and 3757 multiparous. Overall, migrant women had higher adjusted ORs (aORs) for episiotomy (primiparas: aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.26-1.61; multiparas: 1.39, 95% CI 1.21-1.60) and instrumental births (primiparas: 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27, multiparas: 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.72) and lower aORs of induction of labor (primiparas: 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98; multiparas: 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.83), compared with Icelandic women. Migrant women from countries with a high Human Development Index score (≥0.900) had similar or better outcomes compared with Icelandic women, whereas migrant women from countries with a lower Human Development Index score than that of Iceland (<0.900) had additionally increased odds of maternal and perinatal complications and interventions, such as emergency cesarean and postpartum hemorrhage.

conclusionsWomen's citizenship and country of citizenship Human Development Index scores are significantly associated with a range of maternal and perinatal complications and interventions, such as episiotomy and instrumental birth. The results indicate the need for further exploration of whether Icelandic perinatal healthcare services meet the care needs of migrant women.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealthcare DisparitiesAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIcelandInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareProspective Studieschildbirth interventionsmaternal outcomemigrantperinatal complicationsperinatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID34022065
PMCPMC8453980
OpenAlexW3165637115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.