Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022052›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2021

Support for the Reliability and Validity of the National Institutes of Health Impact Stratification Score in a Sample of Active-Duty U.S. Military Personnel with Low Back Pain.

Ron D Hays, Maria Orlando Edelen, Anthony Rodriguez, Patricia Herman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04426812 (Measuring Chronic Pain Impact), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04426812 completednot on this map

Measuring Chronic Pain Impact

TypeobservationalSponsorRANDRan2021 to 2024Enrolled11,146ConditionsChronic PainArmsNo intervention, just data collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Well Do Seven Self-Report Measures Represent Underlying Back Pain Impact?Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ron D HaysDivision of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6697-907X
Maria Orlando EdelenRAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anthony RodriguezRAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Patricia HermanRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-5654
RAND Corporation · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Measuring Chronic Pain ImpactR01AT010402 · NCCIH · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE, HERMAN, PATRICIA M · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the Impact Stratification Score (ISS) measure of low back pain impact that assesses physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity.

designSecondary analyses of a prospective comparative effectiveness trial of active-duty military personnel with low back pain.

settingA Naval hospital at a military training site (Pensacola, Florida) and two military medical centers: 1) Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (Bethesda, Maryland); and 2) San Diego Naval Medical Center. SUBJECTS: The 749 active-duty military personnel had an average age of 31 years, 76% were male, and 67% were white.

methodsParticipants completed questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks later, and 12 weeks later. Measures included the ISS, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), PROMIS-29 v1.0 satisfaction with social role participation scale, and single-item ratings of average pain, feeling bothered by low back pain in the past week, and a rating of change in low back pain.

resultsInternal consistency reliability for the ISS was 0.92-0.93 at the three time points. The ISS correlated 0.75 to 0.84 with the RMDQ, 0.51 to 0.78 with the single-item ratings, and -0.64 to -0.71 with satisfaction with social role participation. The ISS was responsive to change on the three single items. The area under the curve for the ISS predicting improvement on the rating of change from baseline to 6 weeks later was 0.83.

conclusionsThis study provides support for the reliability and validity of the ISS as a patient-reported summary measure for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain. The ISS is a useful indicator of low back impact.

Indexed as

Low Back PainMilitary PersonnelAdultComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansMaleNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Prospective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesBack PainMeasurementQuality of LifeResearch

Identifiers

PMID34022052
PMCPMC8677434
OpenAlexW3164113445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.