ArticleChest2021
Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction: "Right Ventricular Dysfunction" or "Biventricular Dysfunction"?
Article in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Adjunct Techniques in the Assessment of Hypovolemia: A Prospective Pilot Project.The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- Hmgcs2 regulates M2 polarization of macrophages to repair myocardial injury induced by sepsis.Aging · 2023Article
- Inflammatory mechanisms and intervention strategies for sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byResponse.2021
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34022004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.