Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34021808›Full record

Observational studyInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2021

Nurses' internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centers: a cross-sectional descriptive study.

Antoine Villa, Mathieu Molimard, Dunia Sakr, Régis Lassalle, Emmanuelle Bignon, Béatrice Martinez, Magali Rouyer, Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier, Isabelle Baldi, Catherine Verdun-Esquer and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Occupational Settings: A Systematic Review of Biological Monitoring Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antoine VillaEpicene Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Inserm, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Mathieu MolimardLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Clinique Et Toxicologie, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Dunia SakrBordeaux PharmacoEpi (BPE, CIC 1401), Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Régis LassalleBordeaux PharmacoEpi (BPE, CIC 1401), Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Emmanuelle BignonBordeaux PharmacoEpi (BPE, CIC 1401), Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Béatrice MartinezPharmacoepidemiology Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Inserm, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Magali RouyerBordeaux PharmacoEpi (BPE, CIC 1401), Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Simone Mathoulin-PelissierEpicene Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Inserm, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Isabelle BaldiEpicene Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Inserm, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Catherine Verdun-EsquerService Santé Travail Environnement, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Mireille Canal-RaffinLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Clinique Et Toxicologie, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France. mireille.canal-raffin@u-bordeaux.fr.
Université de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

French Ministry of Health PHRC-I n° 13-077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess internal antineoplastic drugs (ADs) contamination in the nursing staff in French hospital centers, using highly sensitive analytical methods.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included nurses practicing in care departments where at least one of the five ADs studied was handled (5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, methotrexate). The nurses study participation lasted 24 h including collection of three urine samples and one self-questionnaire. All urine samples were assayed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods with very low value of the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).

results74 nurses were included, 222 urine samples and 74 self-questionnaires were collected; 1092 urine assays were performed. The percentage of nurses with internal AD contamination was 60.8% and low levels of urinary concentrations were measured. Regarding nurses with internal contamination (n = 45), 42.2% presented internal contamination by methotrexate, 37.8% by cyclophosphamide, 33.3% by ifosfamide, 17.8% by 5-fluorouracil metabolite and 6.7% by doxorubicine. Among the positive assays, 17.9% (n = 26/145) were not explained by exposure data from the self-questionnaire but this could be due to the skin contact of nurses with contaminated work surfaces.

conclusionsThis study reported high percentage of nurses with internal ADs contamination. The low LLOQ values of the used analytical methods, allowed the detection of ADs that would not have been detected with the current published methods: the percentage of contamination would have been 17.6% instead of the 60.8% reported here. Pending toxicological reference values, urine ADs concentrations should be reduced as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle).

Indexed as

NursesNursing Staff, HospitalAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiological MonitoringCross-Sectional StudiesCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleFluorouracilHospitalsHumansIfosfamideMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFluorouracilIfosfamideMethotrexateAntineoplastic drugsBiomonitoringInternal contaminationNursesOccupational exposureUrine analysis

Identifiers

PMID34021808
OpenAlexW3161708771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.