Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34021794›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Impact of femoro-tibial size combinations and TKA design on kinematics.

Ingrid Dupraz, Christoph Thorwächter, Thomas M Grupp, Florian Hammerschmid, Matthias Woiczinski, Volkmar Jansson, Peter E Müller, Arnd Steinbrück

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improved quadriceps efficiency with a medial pivot in comparison to a cruciate-retaining design in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingrid DuprazAesculap AG, Research and Development, Am Aesculap Platz 1, 78532, Tuttlingen, Germany. ingrid.dupraz@aesculap.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-7780
Christoph ThorwächterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Thomas M GruppAesculap AG, Research and Development, Am Aesculap Platz 1, 78532, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Florian HammerschmidDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Matthias WoiczinskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Volkmar JanssonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Peter E MüllerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Arnd SteinbrückDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe variability in patients' femoral and tibial anatomy requires to use different tibia component sizes with the same femoral component size. These size combinations are allowed by manufacturers, but the clinical impact remains unclear. Therefore, the goals of our study were to investigate whether combining different sizes has an impact on the kinematics for two well-established knee systems and to compare these systems' kinematics to the native kinematics. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix fresh frozen knee specimens were tested in a force controlled knee rig before and after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR) and a posterior-stabilized (PS) implant. Femoro-tibial kinematics were recorded using a ultrasonic-based motion analysis system while performing a loaded squat from 30° to 130°. In each knee, the original best fit inlay was then replaced by different inlays simulating a smaller or bigger tibia component. The kinematics obtained with the simulated sizes were compared to the original inlay kinematics using descriptive statistics.

resultsFor all size combinations, the difference to the original kinematics reached an average of 1.3 ± 3.3 mm in translation and - 0.1 ± 1.2° in rotation with the CR implant. With the PS implant, the average differences reached 0.4 ± 2.7 mm and  - 0.2 ± 0.8°. Among all knees, no size combination consistently resulted in significantly different kinematics. Each knee showed a singular kinematic pattern. For both knee systems, the rotation was smaller than in the native knee, but the direction of the rotation was preserved. The PS showed more rollback and the CR less rollback than the native knee.

conclusionTKA systems designed with a constant tibio-femoral congruency among size combinations should enable to combine different sizes without having substantial impact on the kinematics. The rotational pattern was preserved by both TKA systems, while the rollback could only be maintained by the PS design.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKnee JointRange of Motion, ArticularTibiaComponent sizeKinematicsKnee rigSize combinationsTKA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.