Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34021772›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2021

Disruptions of neurological services, its causes and mitigation strategies during COVID-19: a global review.

David García-Azorín, Katrin M Seeher, Charles R Newton, Njideka U Okubadejo, Andrea Pilotto, Deanna Saylor, Andrea Sylvia Winkler, Chahnez Charfi Triki, Matilde Leonardi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Telemedicine in Headache Medicine: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Being a technician during COVID-19: a qualitative cross-sectional survey on the experiences of clinical neurophysiology technicians.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David García-AzorínHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology. Hospital, Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain. dgazorin@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-1064
Katrin M SeeherDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Charles R NewtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6999-5507
Njideka U OkubadejoNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2975-8803
Andrea PilottoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2029-6606
Deanna SaylorDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9297-0244
Andrea Sylvia WinklerCentre for Global Health, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-6983
Chahnez Charfi Triki *Child neurology department-Hedi Chaker Hospital, LR19ES 15-Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-3819
Matilde Leonardi *Neurology, Public Health, Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-8923

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic leads to disruptions of health services worldwide. To evaluate the particular impact on neurological services a rapid review was conducted.

methodsStudies reporting the provision of neurological services during the pandemic and/or adopted mitigation strategies were included in this review. PubMed and World Health Organization's (WHO) COVID-19 database were searched. Data extraction followed categories used by WHO COVID-19 pulse surveys and operational guidelines on maintaining essential health services during COVID-19.

findingsThe search yielded 1101 articles, of which 369 fulfilled eligibility criteria, describing data from 210,419 participants, being adults (81%), children (11.4%) or both (7.3%). Included articles reported data from 105 countries and territories covering all WHO regions and World Bank income levels (low income: 1.9%, lower middle: 24.7%, upper middle: 29.5% and high income; 44.8%). Cross-sectoral services for neurological disorders were most frequently disrupted (62.9%), followed by emergency/acute care (47.1%). The degree of disruption was at least moderate for 75% of studies. Travel restrictions due to lockdowns (81.7%) and regulatory closure of services (65.4%) were the most commonly reported causes of disruption. Authors most frequently described telemedicine (82.1%) and novel dispensing approaches for medicines (51.8%) as mitigation strategies. Evidence for the effectiveness of these measures is largely missing.

interpretationThe COVID-19 pandemic affects all aspects of neurological care. Given the worldwide prevalence of neurological disorders and the potential long-term neurological consequences of COVID-19, service disruptions are devastating. Different strategies such as telemedicine might mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic, but their efficacy and acceptability remain to be seen.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAdultChildCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Health services administrationNervous system diseasesNeurologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34021772
PMCPMC8140556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.