Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34021583›Full record

ReviewPlant & cell physiology2021

Tools for Assessing Cell-Cycle Progression in Plants.

Clara Echevarría, Crisanto Gutierrez, Bénédicte Desvoyes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant & cell physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Journey to the Core of the Plant Cell Cycle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clara EchevarríaDepartment of Genome Dynamics and Function, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Nicolás Cabrera 1, Madrid 28049, Spain.
Crisanto GutierrezDepartment of Genome Dynamics and Function, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Nicolás Cabrera 1, Madrid 28049, Spain.
Bénédicte DesvoyesDepartment of Genome Dynamics and Function, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Nicolás Cabrera 1, Madrid 28049, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7116-9821
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ES

Funding

Banco de Santander and Fundación Ramon ArecesEuropean Research Council 2018-AdG_833617MCEI and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER RTI2018-094793-B-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación BIO2017-92329-EXP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimation of cell-cycle parameters is crucial for understanding the developmental programs established during the formation of an organism. A number of complementary approaches have been developed and adapted to plants to assess the cell-cycle status in different proliferative tissues. The most classical methods relying on metabolic labeling are still very much employed and give valuable information on cell-cycle progression in fixed tissues. However, the growing knowledge of plant cell-cycle regulators with defined expression pattern together with the development of fluorescent proteins technology enabled the generation of fusion proteins that function individually or in conjunction as cell-cycle reporters. Together with the improvement of imaging techniques, in vivo live imaging to monitor plant cell-cycle progression in normal growth conditions or in response to different stimuli has been possible. Here, we review these tools and their specific outputs for plant cell-cycle analysis.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesArabidopsisCell CycleImaging, Three-DimensionalStaining and LabelingFluorescent DyesArabidopsisCell cycleLive-imagingMetabolic labelingplantsReporter genes

Identifiers

PMID34021583
PMCPMC8579159
OpenAlexW3161829663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.