ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021
Comparison of charge transport and opto-electronic properties of pyrene and anthracene derivatives for OLED applications.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Theoretical analysis of OLED performances of some aromatic nitrogen-containing ligands.Turkish journal of chemistry · 2023Article
- A DFT analysis of electronic, reactivity, and NLO responses of a reactive orange dye: the role of Hartree-Fock exchange corrections.Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, three organic semiconductors such as 9-[(5-nitropyridin-2-aminoethyl)iminiomethyl]-anthracene (a), N'-((pyren-4-yl)methylene)isonicotinohydrazide (b), and novel organic semiconductor N-(2-((pyren-4-yl)methyleneamino)ethyl)-5-nitropyridin-2-amine (c) were prepared. Their structures were assessed using NMR and elemental analysis techniques. While compound (a) and compound (c) have the same wing unit ([(5-nitropyridin-2-aminoethyl) iminiomethyl]), compounds (b) and (c) have the same core unit (5-nitropyridin-2-amine). Based on TD-DFT and Marcus theories, we have explored the effects of molecular structure on the opto-electronic properties for OLED applications. Our results show that wing units of molecules impact more on the opto-electronics properties than on core units. The compounds (a) and (c) with the same wing unit have exhibited quite similar behaviors in terms of both structural and opto-electronic parameters. However, a similar situation has not been observed for compounds (b) and (c) with the same core unit. In conclusion, our results indicate that compounds (a) and (c) exhibit obvious advantages for OLEDs in terms of calculated opto-electronic and charge transport properties such as better absorption and emission parameters, lower energy gaps and reorganisation energies and higher charge mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.