ReviewNeuroradiology2021
Fetal thick corpus callosum: new insights from neuroimaging and neuropathology in two cases and literature review.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective analysis of the prognostic factors of fetal corpus callosum dysplasia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Assessment of fetal corpus callosum biometry by 3D super-resolution reconstructed T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Corpus callosum in children with neurodevelopmental delay: MRI standard qualitative assessment versus automatic quantitative analysis.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Neuronal nitric oxyde synthase positive neurons in human indusium griseum.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Anomalies of the Corpus Callosum in Prenatal Ultrasound: A Narrative Review for Diagnosis and Further Counseling.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the correlation between fetal imaging (in vivo and ex vivo) and neuropathology in two fetuses at early gestational age (GA) with isolated thick corpus callosum (CC), a rare finding whose pathological significance and neuropathology data are scarce.
methodsTwo fetuses at 21-week GA underwent fetal MRI (fMRI) for suspected callosal anomalies at ultrasound (US). After fMRI results, termination of pregnancy (TOP) was carried out and post-mortem MRI (pmMRI) was performed. Neuropathology correlation consisted in macro and microscopic evaluation with sections prepared for hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry staining.
resultsFetal imaging confirmed in both cases the presence of a shorter and thicker CC with respect to the reference standard at the same GA, without a clear distinction between its different parts. Moreover, on pmMRI, an abnormal slightly T2-weighted hyperintense layer along the superior and inferior surface of CC was noted in both cases. At histopathology, these findings corresponded to an increased amount of white matter tracts but also to an abnormal representation of embryological structures that contribute to CC development, naming induseum griseum (IG) and the glioepithelial layer (GL) of the "callosal sling." After reviewing the literature data, we confirmed the recent embryological theory regarding the CC development and provide new insights into the pathophysiology of the abnormal cases.
conclusionsAn abnormally thick CC at the early fetal period could be associated to an abnormal representation of the midline glia structures, so to result in potential disturbance of the axon guidance mechanism of callosal formation and eventually in CC dysgenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.