Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34021272›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2022

A critical evaluation of current definitions of necrotizing enterocolitis.

Shiloh R Lueschow, Timothy J Boly, Elizabeth Jasper, Ravi M Patel, Steven J McElroy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Definitions of neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Necrotizing enterocolitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The conundrum of intestinal injury in preterm infants receiving mother's own milk.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shiloh R LueschowDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Timothy J BolyStead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Elizabeth JasperDivision of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ravi M PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven J McElroyDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. steven-mcelroy@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-723X
University of Iowa · USEmory University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007343 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI STAPLETON, JACK T. · 1988 to 2024
$5.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNecrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating intestinal disease of premature infants, with significant mortality and long-term morbidity among survivors. Multiple NEC definitions exist, but no formal head-to-head evaluation has been performed. We hypothesized that contemporary definitions would perform better in evaluation metrics than Bell's and range features would be more frequently identified as important than yes/no features.

methodsTwo hundred and nineteen patients from the University of Iowa hospital with NEC, intestinal perforation, or NEC concern were identified from a 10-year retrospective cohort. NEC presence was confirmed by a blinded investigator. Evaluation metrics were calculated using statistics and six supervised machine learning classifiers for current NEC definitions. Feature importance evaluation was performed on each decision tree classifier.

resultsNewer definitions outperformed Bell's staging using both standard statistics and most machine learning classifiers. The decision tree classifier had the highest overall machine learning scores, which resulted in Non-Bell definitions having high sensitivity (0.826, INC) and specificity (0.969, ST), while Modified Bell (IIA+) had reasonable sensitivity (0.783), but poor specificity (0.531). Feature importance evaluation identified nine criteria as important for diagnosis.

conclusionsThis preliminary study suggests that Non-Bell NEC definitions may be better at diagnosing NEC and calls for further examination of definitions and important criteria. IMPACT: This article is the first formal head-to-head evaluation of current available definitions of NEC. Non-Bell NEC definitions may be more effective in identifying NEC based on findings from traditional measures of diagnostic performance and machine learning techniques. Nine features were identified as important for diagnosis from the definitions evaluated within the decision tree when performing supervised classification machine learning. This article serves as a preliminary study to formally evaluate the definitions of NEC utilized and should be expounded upon with a larger and more diverse patient cohort.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingFetal DiseasesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant, Premature, DiseasesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34021272
OpenAlexW3163626671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.