ArticleScientific reports2021
Antimicrobial responses of peripheral and central nervous system glia against Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microglia and neuroinflammation: An in-depth analysis from functional diversity to disease mechanisms.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Micro/Nanoparticles in the Nose-Brain Axis: Implications for Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Interventions.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Chemical and biomolecular insights into theIsrael journal of chemistry · 2023Article
- Article
- The glia-neutrophil axis: an understudied crosstalk in bacteria-induced neuroinflammation.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus infections of the central nervous system are serious and can be fatal. S. aureus is commonly present in the nasal cavity, and after injury to the nasal epithelium it can rapidly invade the brain via the olfactory nerve. The trigeminal nerve constitutes another potential route of brain infection. The glia of these nerves, olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and trigeminal nerve Schwann cells (TgSCs), as well as astrocytes populating the glia limitans layer, can phagocytose bacteria. Whilst some glial responses to S. aureus have been studied, the specific responses of different glial types are unknown. Here, we compared how primary mouse OECs, TgSCs, astrocytes and microglia responded to S. aureus. All glial types internalized the bacteria within phagolysosomes, and S. aureus-conjugated BioParticles could be tracked with subtle but significant differences in time-course of phagocytosis between glial types. Live bacteria could be isolated from all glia after 24 h in culture, and microglia, OECs and TgSCs exhibited better protection against intracellular S. aureus survival than astrocytes. All glial types responded to the bacteria by cytokine secretion. Overall, OECs secreted the lowest level of cytokines, suggesting that these cells, despite showing strong capacity for phagocytosis, have immunomodulatory functions that can be relevant for neural repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.