Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020962›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open respiratory research2021

Feasibility of investigating methylphenidate for the treatment of sarcoidosis-associated fatigue (the FaST-MP study): a double-blind, parallel-arm randomised feasibility trial.

Christopher Atkins, Andy Jones, Allan B Clark, Andrea Stockl, Richard Fordham, Andrew M Wilson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02643732 (Fatigue in Sarcoidosis - A Feasibility Study Investigating the Treatment of Fatigue in Stable Sarcoidosis Patients Using Methylphenidate), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02643732 naunknown statusnot on this map

Fatigue in Sarcoidosis - A Feasibility Study Investigating the Treatment of Fatigue in Stable Sarcoidosis Patients Using Methylphenidate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of East AngliaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled30ConditionsSarcoidosis, FatigueArmsMethylphenidate (overencapsulated), Placebo (Over-encapsulated tablet)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in management of sarcoidosis-associated fatigue: A narrative review.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2026
    Article
  2. Rheumatic Manifestations of Sarcoidosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher AtkinsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK christopher.atkins@nnuh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-8374
Andy JonesNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Allan B ClarkNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Andrea StocklNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Richard FordhamNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Andrew M WilsonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK.
University of East Anglia · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSarcoidosis-associated fatigue (SAF) is a common clinical problem with limited treatment options. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of performing a definitive trial to determine the clinical efficacy methylphenidate in SAF.

methodsThis was a parallel-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised controlled feasibility trial enrolling sarcoidosis patients reporting significant fatigue. Patients with a Fatigue Assessment Scale score of more than 21 were randomised to receive up to either 10 mg two times per day methylphenidate or identical placebo capsules two times per day, in a dose escalation fashion, for up to 24 weeks. Outcomes included number of participants eligible and willing to participate, withdrawal rates, adherence rates and ability to maintain blinding.

resultsOf 385 patients screened, 56 (14.5%) were eligible and 23 (41% of eligible patients) were randomised. No withdrawals occurred. One participant in the methylphenidate arm discontinued study medications due to chest pain. The side effect profile was not different between the groups. Median medication adherence rates were 98% and 99% in the methylphenidate and placebo arms, respectively. A greater proportion of participants receiving methylphenidate predicted their allocated treatment while blinded compared with those receiving placebo (93.3% vs 57.1%). The investigator could not predict the treatment allocation. Both groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue from baseline, although no between-group difference was seen.

conclusionsThe data support the feasibility of performing a double-blind parallel trial powered to determine the clinical efficacy of methylphenidate for SAF, however, a multicentre study will be required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02643732.

Indexed as

MethylphenidateSarcoidosisDouble-Blind MethodFatigueFeasibility StudiesHumansMethylphenidatesarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID34020962
PMCPMC8144057
OpenAlexW3163447598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.