Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020936›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Orchard Management and Landscape Context Mediate the Pear Floral Microbiome.

Robert N Schaeffer, Vera W Pfeiffer, Saumik Basu, Matthew Brousil, Christopher Strohm, S Tianna DuPont, Rachel L Vannette, David W Crowder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert N Schaeffer *Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Vera W Pfeiffer *Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Saumik BasuDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Matthew BrousilDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Christopher StrohmTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, Washington, USA.
S Tianna DuPontTree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, Washington, USA.
Rachel L VannetteDepartment of Entomology & Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
David W CrowderDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop-associated microbiota are a key factor affecting host health and productivity. Most crops are grown within heterogeneous landscapes, and interactions between management practices and landscape context often affect plant and animal biodiversity in agroecosystems. However, whether these same factors typically affect crop-associated microbiota is less clear. Here, we assessed whether orchard management strategies and landscape context affected bacterial and fungal communities in pear (Pyrus communis) flowers. We found that bacteria and fungi responded differently to management schemes. Organically certified orchards had higher fungal diversity in flowers than conventional or bio-based integrated pest management (IPM) orchards, but organic orchards had the lowest bacterial diversity. Orchard management scheme also best predicted the distribution of several important bacterial and fungal genera that either cause or suppress disease; organic and bio-based IPM best explained the distributions of bacterial and fungal genera, respectively. Moreover, patterns of bacterial and fungal diversity were affected by interactions between management, landscape context, and climate. When examining the similarity of bacterial and fungal communities across sites, both abundance- and taxon-related turnovers were mediated primarily by orchard management scheme and landscape context and, specifically, the amount of land in cultivation. Our study reveals local- and landscape-level drivers of floral microbiome structure in a major fruit crop, providing insights that can inform microbiome management to promote host health and high-yielding quality fruit.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAgricultureBacteriaCrops, AgriculturalDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalFlowersFungiPyrusWashingtonDNA, BacterialDNA, Fungalflower microbiomeintegrated pest managementlandscape heterogeneityPyrus communis

Identifiers

PMID34020936
PMCPMC8276804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.