Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020724›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with a normal cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Kimberley P Williams, Liam McAuliffe, Rosanna Diacci, Anne-Marie Aubin, Ashad Issah, Carol Wang, Jason Phung, Craig E Pennell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberley P WilliamsSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Liam McAuliffeSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosanna DiacciSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne-Marie AubinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Ashad IssahSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Carol WangSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Jason PhungSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. Jason.Phung@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8110-7648
Craig E PennellSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) is estimated to affect 14.9 million babies globally every year. Global rates of PTB continue to increase from 9.8 to 10.6% over a 15-year period from 2000 to 2014. Vaginal progesterone is commonly used by clinicians as a prevention strategy, with recent evidence affirming the benefit of vaginal (micronised) progesterone to prevent PTB in women with a shortened cervix (< 25 mm). Given the low incidence of a short cervix at mid-gestation in high-risk populations further evidence is required. The objective of this review is to determine if vaginal progesterone reduces spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) before 37 weeks in asymptomatic high-risk women with a singleton pregnancy with a normal mid-gestation cervical length.

methodsStudies will be sourced from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception onwards with the search terms 'progesterone' and 'preterm birth'. Studies will be screened and included if they assess vaginal progesterone compared to placebo in women with a normal cervical length. The primary outcome will be sPTB < 37 weeks, with secondary outcomes of sPTB < 34 weeks. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening at abstract and full text level, data extraction and risk of bias assessment with disagreements resolved by an experienced researcher. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects analysis model will be used to produce treatment effect odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. DISCUSSION: This review will assess the current body of evidence and provide clarity regarding the potential benefits and best practice of use of vaginal progesterone in asymptomatic women with high-risk singleton pregnancies and normal cervical length.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42020152051.

Indexed as

Premature BirthProgesteroneAdministration, IntravaginalCervix UteriFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancySystematic Reviews as TopicVaginaProgesteroneCervicalPreterm birthProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID34020724
PMCPMC8139044
OpenAlexW3160296748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.