ArticleBMC research notes2021
Genome data of four Pythium insidiosum strains from the phylogenetically-distinct clades I, II, and III.
Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MGI short-read genome assemblies of Pythium insidiosum (reclassified as Pythium periculosum) strains Pi057C3 and Pi050C3.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- PacBio long read-assembled draft genome of Pythium insidiosum strain Pi-S isolated from a Thai patient with pythiosis.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis Reveals Gene Content Diversity, Phylogenomic Contour, Putative Virulence Determinants, and Potential Diagnostic Markers withinJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nucleic Acid-Based Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Selection of an Appropriate In Vitro Susceptibility Test for Assessing Anti-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis.Vaccines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe employed the Illumina NGS platform to sequence genomes of 4 different strains of the pathogenic oomycete Pythium insidiosum, the causative agent of pythiosis. These strains were isolated from humans in Thailand (n = 3) and the United States (n = 1), and phylogenetically classified into clade-I, -II, and -III. Our study augmented the completeness of the P. insidiosum genome database for exploration of the biology, evolution, and pathogenesis of the pathogen. DATA DESCRIPTION: One paired-end library (180-bp insert) was prepared from a gDNA sample of P. insidiosum strains ATCC200269 (clade-I), Pi19 (clade-II), MCC18 (clade-II), and SIMI4763 (clade-III) for whole-genome sequencing by Illumina HiSeq2000/HiSeq2500 NGS platform. A range of 28.4-59.4 million raw reads, accounted for 3.0-7.3 Gb, were obtained and assembled into the genome sizes of 47.1 Mb (15,153 contigs; 85% completeness; 19,329 open reading frames [ORFs]) for strain ATCC200269, 35.4 Mb (14,576 contigs; 83% completeness; 13,895 ORFs) for strain Pi19, 34.5 Mb (11,084 contigs; 84% completeness; 13,249 ORFs) for strain MCC18, and 47.1 Mb (15,162 contigs; 85% completeness; 19,340 ORFs) for strain SIMI4763. The genome data can be downloaded from the NCBI/DDBJ databases under the accessions BCFN00000000.1 (ATCC200269), BCFS00000000.1 (Pi19), BCFT00000000.1 (MCC18), and BCFU00000000.1 (SIMI4763).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.