Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020700›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2021

Sarcocystis species in bovine carcasses from a Belgian abattoir: a cross-sectional study.

Hang Zeng, Inge Van Damme, Teresia Wanjiru Kabi, Barbara Šoba, Sarah Gabriël

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. First Identification of Pathogenic and Zoonotic-RelevantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024
    Article
  6. Red foxes (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. A Systematic Meta-Analysis of GlobalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Occurrence and Meta-Analysis of Investigations onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  12. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hang ZengDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Inge Van DammeDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Teresia Wanjiru KabiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Barbara ŠobaDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Sarah GabriëlDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. sarah.gabriel@ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201706910091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcocystis species are obligatorily heteroxenous parasites, of which some are zoonotic, representing a public health and economic impact. This study investigated the occurrence of Sarcocystis spp. in cattle sampled from a Belgian slaughterhouse.

methodsA total of 200 carcasses were included in the study, sampled during 10 sampling days. The sedimentation method was applied to isolate the sarcocysts from both heart and diaphragm muscles collected from each carcass. Multiplex PCR, PCR-RFLP as well as cox1 gene sequencing techniques were applied serially on collected sarcocysts for species identification.

resultsSarcocystis spp. were detected in 64% (128/200; 95% CI 57-71%) of the sampled carcasses. Female dairy cattle presented the highest Sarcocystis occurrence rate (91%) as well as the highest Sarcocystis species diversity compared to female beef and male beef. Sarcocystis spp. were detected more often in the heart muscles than in the diaphragm among female beef (p < 0.001) and dairy carcasses (p = 0.001), while in male carcasses no significant difference was observed (p = 0.763). The effect of age was not significant in male carcasses (p = 0.872), while the odds of finding sarcocysts significantly increased with age (p = 0.003) within both types of female carcasses. S. cruzi was the most prevalent species and was found in 56.5% (113/200) of the carcasses, followed by S. hominis (21.0%, 42/200), S. bovifelis (12.5%, 25/200), S. bovini (2.0%, 4/200), S. hirsuta (1.5%, 3/200) and S. heydorni (0.5%, 1/200). Six different species were detected in the diaphragm, while only two species were recovered from the heart. S. cruzi was the most prevalent species in heart, while in the diaphragm, this was S. hominis.

conclusionsThe detection of S. hominis in 21% of the sampled carcasses presents a potential food safety issue, and further research is warranted into controlling this infection.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsBelgiumCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, RibosomalFemaleGenetic VariationMalePhylogenyRed MeatRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSarcocystisSarcocystosisSequence Analysis, DNADNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18SBelgiumCarcassCattleCox1Observational studySarcocystis hominisSarcocystis spp.

Identifiers

PMID34020700
PMCPMC8138977
OpenAlexW3163419687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.