Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020606›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Lack of concern about body image and health during pregnancy linked to excessive gestational weight gain and small-for-gestational-age deliveries: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Naw Awn J-P, Marina Minami, Masamitsu Eitoku, Nagamasa Maeda, Mikiya Fujieda, Narufumi Suganuma, Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Group

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond the mirror: Exploring the impact of maternal body image attitudes on gestational weight gain and maternal and neonatal outcomes, a systematic review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naw Awn J-PDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan.
Marina MinamiDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan.
Masamitsu EitokuDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan. meitoku@kochi-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1715-9670
Nagamasa MaedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
Mikiya FujiedaDepartment of Pediatrics, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.
Narufumi SuganumaDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan.
Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Group
Kōchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women in Japan express various reasons for limiting gestational weight gain (GWG). We aimed to identify and characterise groups where the women share common reasons to limit GWG and to examine how these groups are associated with inappropriate GWG and abnormal foetal size.

methodsWe prospectively studied information from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS) on 92,539 women who gave birth to live singletons from 2011 through 2014. Pregnant women were recruited during early pregnancy. Their reasons for limiting GWG and other information were collected through self-reported questionnaires and medical records. We applied latent class analysis to group the women based on their reported reasons. We used multinomial logistic regression to compare the risks of inappropriate (inadequate and excessive) GWG and abnormal foetal size (determined by new-born weight for gestational age) between the identified groups.

resultsWe identified three groups: Group 1 (76.7%), concerned about delivery and new-born health (health-conscious women); Group 2 (14.5%), concerned about body shape, delivery, and new-born health (body-shape- and health-conscious women); and Group 3 (8.8%), women without strong reasons to limit GWG (women lacking body-shape and health consciousness). Compared with Group 1 members, Group 2 members tended to be younger, have lower pre-pregnancy weight, be unmarried, be nulliparous, have practiced weight loss before pregnancy, and not have chronic medical conditions. Group 3 members tended to be less educated, unmarried, multiparous, smokers, and have a higher prevalence of pre-pregnancy underweight and previous caesarean delivery. Relative to Group 1, Group 2 had a lower unadjusted risk for inadequate GWG (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and large-for-gestational-age birth (RRR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97), whereas Group 3 had a higher unadjusted risk for excessive GWG (RRR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.29-1.43) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births (RRR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25).

conclusionsIn this Japanese nationwide birth cohort study, pregnant women who were less conscious about body shape and health had complex risks for excessive GWG and SGA birth. Health care providers should consider a woman's perception of GWG when addressing factors affecting GWG and foetal growth.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainAdultBody ImageFemaleHumansJapanPregnancyPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudes on gestational weight gainDietingOverweightPregnancySmall for gestational ageUnderweight

Identifiers

PMID34020606
PMCPMC8139142
OpenAlexW3162979541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.