Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020546›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

A comprehensive survey of regulatory network inference methods using single cell RNA sequencing data.

Hung Nguyen, Duc Tran, Bang Tran, Bahadir Pehlivan, Tin Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells: Methods and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Predicting the unseen: A diffusion-based debiasing framework for transcriptional response prediction at single-cell resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multi-omic network inference from time-series data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hung NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Duc TranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Bang TranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Bahadir PehlivanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Tin NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.

Funding

Outreach/Diversity/Pipeline ProjectP20GM103440 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI Eduardo A Robleto · 2012 to 2026
$58.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene regulatory network is a complicated set of interactions between genetic materials, which dictates how cells develop in living organisms and react to their surrounding environment. Robust comprehension of these interactions would help explain how cells function as well as predict their reactions to external factors. This knowledge can benefit both developmental biology and clinical research such as drug development or epidemiology research. Recently, the rapid advance of single-cell sequencing technologies, which pushed the limit of transcriptomic profiling to the individual cell level, opens up an entirely new area for regulatory network research. To exploit this new abundant source of data and take advantage of data in single-cell resolution, a number of computational methods have been proposed to uncover the interactions hidden by the averaging process in standard bulk sequencing. In this article, we review 15 such network inference methods developed for single-cell data. We discuss their underlying assumptions, inference techniques, usability, and pros and cons. In an extensive analysis using simulation, we also assess the methods' performance, sensitivity to dropout and time complexity. The main objective of this survey is to assist not only life scientists in selecting suitable methods for their data and analysis purposes but also computational scientists in developing new methods by highlighting outstanding challenges in the field that remain to be addressed in the future development.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwaregene regulatory networkRNA sequencingscRNA-seqsimulation studiessingle-cell data

Identifiers

PMID34020546
PMCPMC8138892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.