Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34020049›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2021

Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: Prevalence, predictors, and associated in-hospital adverse events from 17,700 procedures in the United States.

Muhammad Bilal Munir, Muhammad Zia Khan, Douglas Darden, Deepak Kumar Pasupula, Sudarshan Balla, Frederick T Han, Ryan Reeves, Jonathan C Hsu

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mitral regurgitation and in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outcomes of patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Psychosocial Risk Factors on Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Patients undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Implantation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in atrial fibrillation patients based on underlying stroke risk.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Bilal MunirSection of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Muhammad Zia KhanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Douglas DardenSection of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Deepak Kumar PasupulaDivision of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sudarshan BallaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Frederick T HanSection of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Ryan ReevesSection of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jonathan C HsuSection of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: Jonathan.Hsu@ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · USWest Virginia University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft atrial appendage occlusion has shown promise in mitigating the risk of stroke in selected patients with atrial fibrillation.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the real-world prevalence and in-hospital outcomes in left atrial appendage occlusion (Watchman) recipients complicated by pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous drainage or open cardiac surgery-based intervention.

methodsData were derived from the National Inpatient Sample database from January 2015 to December 2017. The primary outcomes assessed were the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention and in-hospital outcomes including mortality, other major complications, hospital stay > 1 day, and hospitalization costs. Predictors of pericardial effusion requiring intervention were also analyzed.

resultsPericardial effusion requiring intervention occurred in 220 total patients (1.24%). After multivariable adjustment, pericardial effusion requiring intervention was associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 511.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 122-2145.3), other Watchman-related major complications (aOR 1.35; 95% CI 0.83-2.19), length of stay > 1 day (aOR 17.64; 95% CI 12.56-24.77), and hospitalization cost above the median of $24,327 (aOR 3.58; 95% CI 2.61-4.91). Independent patient predictors of pericardial effusion requiring intervention from the procedure included advanced age (aOR 1.029 per 1-year increase; 95% CI 1.009-1.05 per 1-year increase), higher CHA

conclusionIn a large, contemporary real-world cohort of Watchman recipients in US practice, the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was 1.24%. Pericardial effusion requiring intervention was associated with several adverse events including increased in-hospital mortality, other major complications, prolonged hospital stay, and hospitalization costs.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAtrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationCardiac CatheterizationCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceLength of StayMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePericardial EffusionPrevalenceComplicationsMortalityNational estimatesPericardial effusionWatchman

Identifiers

PMID34020049
PMCPMC8558825
OpenAlexW3163344079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.