Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019836›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2021

Geographical distribution of fertility rates in 70 low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries, 2010-16: a subnational analysis of cross-sectional surveys.

Carla Pezzulo, Kristine Nilsen, Alessandra Carioli, Natalia Tejedor-Garavito, Sophie E Hanspal, Theodor Hilber, William H M James, Corrine W Ruktanonchai, Victor Alegana, Alessandro Sorichetta and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carla PezzuloWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: c.pezzulo@soton.ac.uk.
Kristine NilsenWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alessandra CarioliWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Natalia Tejedor-GaravitoWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sophie E HanspalWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Theodor HilberDepartment of Earth Sciences Centre for Development Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
William H M JamesWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; School of Geography, and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Corrine W RuktanonchaiWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Victor AleganaPopulation Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Alessandro SorichettaWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Adelle S WigleyWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Graeme M HornbyWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; GeoData, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Zoe MatthewsDivision of Social Statistics, and Demography and Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty and Policy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Andrew J TatemWorldPop, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 211208Wellcome Trust 211208/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding subnational variation in age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) and total fertility rates (TFRs), and geographical clustering of high fertility and its determinants in low-income and middle-income countries, is increasingly needed for geographical targeting and prioritising of policy. We aimed to identify variation in fertility rates, to describe patterns of key selected fertility determinants in areas of high fertility.

methodsWe did a subnational analysis of ASFRs and TFRs from the most recent publicly available and nationally representative cross-sectional Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys collected between 2010 and 2016 for 70 low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries, across 932 administrative units. We assessed the degree of global spatial autocorrelation by using Moran's I statistic and did a spatial cluster analysis using the Getis-Ord Gi* local statistic to examine the geographical clustering of fertility and key selected fertility determinants. Descriptive analysis was used to investigate the distribution of ASFRs and of selected determinants in each cluster.

findingsTFR varied from below replacement (2·1 children per women) in 36 of the 932 subnational regions (mainly located in India, Myanmar, Colombia, and Armenia), to rates of 8 and higher in 14 subnational regions, located in sub-Saharan Africa and Afghanistan. Areas with high-fertility clusters were mostly associated with areas of low prevalence of women with secondary or higher education, low use of contraception, and high unmet needs for family planning, although exceptions existed.

interpretationSubstantial within-country variation in the distribution of fertility rates highlights the need for tailored programmes and strategies in high-fertility cluster areas to increase the use of contraception and access to secondary education, and to reduce unmet need for family planning.

fundingWellcome Trust, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Birth RateCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesGeographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID34019836
PMCPMC8149299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.