ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2021
Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non-tuberculous mycobacteria.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disinfection and damage of nontuberculous mycobacteria by different UV wavelengths.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Temperature and pH growth preferences predict the pathogenicity and environmental distributions of nontuberculous mycobacteria.mSystems · 2026Article
- Macrophage Response to Avirulent and Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Anti-TB Effects of Exosome Treatment.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections using genomics and artificial intelligence-machine learning approaches: scope, progress and challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Harmonization of supervised machine learning practices for efficient source attribution of Listeria monocytogenes based on genomic data.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Phylogenomics of nontuberculous mycobacteria respiratory infections in people with cystic fibrosis.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2023Review
- Comparative genomic analysis reveals differential genomic characteristics and featured genes between rapid- and slow-growingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Comparative genome analysis reveals high-level drug resistance markers in a clinical isolate ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non-tuberculous mycobacteria.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause various respiratory diseases and even death in severe cases, and its incidence has increased rapidly worldwide. To date, it's difficult to use routine diagnostic methods and strain identification to precisely diagnose various types of NTM infections. We combined systematic comparative genomics with machine learning to select new diagnostic markers for precisely identifying five common pathogenic NTMs (Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellular, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium abscessus). A panel including six genes and two SNPs (nikA, benM, codA, pfkA2, mpr, yjcH, rrl C2638T, rrl A1173G) was selected to simultaneously identify the five NTMs with high accuracy (> 90%). Notably, the panel only containing the six genes also showed a good classification effect (accuracy > 90%). Additionally, the two panels could precisely differentiate the five NTMs from M. tuberculosis (accuracy > 99%). We also revealed some new marker genes/SNPs/combinations to accurately discriminate any one of the five NTMs separately, which provided the possibility to diagnose one certain NTM infection precisely. Our research not only reveals novel promising diagnostic markers to promote the development of precision diagnosis in NTM infectious, but also provides an insight into precisely identifying various genetically close pathogens through comparative genomics and machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.