Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019720›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2021

Adherence to prophylaxis and its association with activation of self-management and treatment satisfaction.

Johanna Wilhelmina Hoefnagels, Liesbeth Hélène Schrijvers, Frank W G Leebeek, Jeroen Eikenboom, Saskia E M Schols, Cees Smit, Roger E G Schutgens, Samantha C Gouw, Kathelijn Fischer, Haemophilia in the Netherlands 6 Steering Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. More real-world evidence on the impact of emicizumab.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adherence to prophylaxis and its association with activation of self-management and treatment satisfaction.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2021
    Article
  10. Adherence to Clotting Factor Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Males With Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna Wilhelmina HoefnagelsVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-2977
Liesbeth Hélène SchrijversVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frank W G LeebeekDepartment of Paediatric Haematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5677-1371
Jeroen EikenboomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-5759
Saskia E M ScholsDepartment of Haematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Cees SmitDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Roger E G SchutgensVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-6033
Samantha C GouwDepartment of Haematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1957-4122
Kathelijn FischerVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-6613
Haemophilia in the Netherlands 6 Steering Group
Utrecht University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProphylactic replacement therapy (prophylaxis) in patients with haemophilia (PWH) requires lifelong, frequent (self)infusions. Prophylaxis effectiveness depends on adherence, and the drivers of treatment adherence among PWH are unclear.

aimTo quantify prophylaxis adherence and associations between adherence and patients' treatment attitudes and satisfaction in a large cohort of children and adults with haemophilia.

methodsIn a nationwide, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, PWH with complete information currently using prophylaxis were selected. Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale-Prophylaxis (VERITAS-Pro; normalised score range: 0-100, optimum 0) measured treatment adherence; the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13; total score range 0-100, optimum 100) measured activation of self-management; Hemophilia Patient Satisfaction Scale (Hemo-Sat; range 0-100, optimum 0) measured treatment satisfaction. Groups were compared according to age (children: <12 years; adolescents: 12-18 years; adults >18 years) and adherence levels using non-parametric tests, and correlations were assessed using Spearman's rho.

resultsAmong 321 participants (median age 33 years, interquartile range [IQR]:15-54 years), adherence was high (median VERITAS-Pro total score 17, 89% adherent) but worsened with age, with median scores of 5, 14 and 20 in children, adolescents, adults, respectively (p < .001). Attitudes towards treatment (median 66 vs. 68) participants and treatment satisfaction (12 vs. 10) were similar between adherent and non-adherent patients. The VERITAS-Pro total score was moderately correlated with PAM-13 (r = .41) but not with Hemo-Sat (r = -.11). DISCUSSION: Prophylaxis adherence was high (89%) but decreased significantly with age and was not correlated with treatment attitude or treatment satisfaction.

Indexed as

Hemophilia ASelf-ManagementAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultadherencecompliancehaemophiliapatient activationtreatment satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID34019720
PMCPMC8362086
OpenAlexW3163921419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.