Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019634›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Maternal Dietary Patterns and Pregnancy Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Shazmeen Omar, Kerri Scherbinsky, Marianne Vidler, Laura A Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Sophie E Moore, Rajavel Elango

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The etiology of preeclampsia.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-3014
Shazmeen OmarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7853-637X
Kerri ScherbinskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-808X
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7633-8812
Laura A MageeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1355-610X
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4136-3070
Sophie E MooreDepartment of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rajavel ElangoDepartment of Pediatrics, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-1725

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1Medical Research Council MR/P027938/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy maternal diets can lower the odds of developing pre-eclampsia, a direct and second leading cause of maternal death, globally. However, there is a research gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), which bear a disproportionate burden of these deaths. The objectives of this systematic review were to: 1) evaluate the association between dietary patterns in pregnancy and hypertensive disorders, including pre-eclampsia for pregnant and postpartum women in LMIC, and 2) compile barriers and facilitators to an adequate maternal diet. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, African Journals Online, the WHO Regional Databases, 2 trial registries, Google Scholar, and reference lists. Included in the analysis were primary research studies of dietary patterns during pregnancy, with pregnancy hypertension outcome(s), and conducted in LMIC. Included studies were assessed using ROBINS-I risk of bias. Thirteen studies were included, of which 5 studies were included in a meta-analysis (Review Manager 5). Lower odds of pre-eclampsia were associated with adequate (compared with no or low) consumption of vegetables (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.80; I2 = 85%; P = 0.01) and adequate (compared with no or low) consumption of fruit (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.71; I2 = 79%; P = 0.008). No firm conclusions could be drawn about the impact on pre-eclampsia odds of any of the following during pregnancy: high consumption of meat or grains; a "Western" diet; or alcohol consumption. More LMIC-based research is needed to explore whether the apparent beneficial effects of fruits and vegetables on pre-eclampsia incidence might be enhanced when maternal malnutrition is prevalent, and/or whether other sociodemographic factors might contribute.

Indexed as

HypertensionPre-EclampsiaDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Outcomelow- and middle-income countries (LMIC)maternal dietsmeta-analysispre-eclampsiapregnancy hypertensionresource-constrainedsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34019634
PMCPMC8634459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.