ArticleArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2022
Improving Renal Tumor Biopsy Prognostication With BAP1 Analyses.
Article in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular underpinnings of metastatic small renal masses.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Genomic Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.European urology · 2023Review
- The expanding role of BAP1 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Human pathology · 2023Review
- Predicting Oncologic Outcomes in Small Renal Tumors.European urology oncology · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CONTEXT.—: Active surveillance of small renal masses highlights the need for accurate prognostication of biopsies. OBJECTIVE.—: To comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of biopsies in assessing known prognostic parameters including histologic subtype by comparison with subsequent nephrectomy samples. DESIGN.—: We retrospectively identified patients at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, who had a biopsy for a renal mass between 2004-2018. Biopsy samples were evaluated for known prognostic factors such as tumor grade, necrosis, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid change, and BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) status, which we previously showed is an independent prognostic factor for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Accuracy was determined by comparison with subsequent analyses of nephrectomy specimens. Statistical analyses were performed to assess biopsy accuracy and correlation with tumor size and pathologic stage. RESULTS.—: From 805 biopsies with a diagnosis of renal neoplasm, 178 had subsequent resection of the biopsied tumor. Concordance rate for histologic subtype was 96.9% (κ [w], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99) and excellent for small renal masses (98.8%; κ [w], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1). Amongst the prognostic variables evaluated, BAP1 immunohistochemistry in clear cell renal cell carcinoma had the highest agreement (94.8%; κ [w], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99). The presence of 1 or more aggressive features (grade 3-4, tumor necrosis, BAP1 loss, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid change) in a biopsy significantly correlated with pT stage (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS.—: Biopsy analyses showed high accuracy for subtyping renal tumors, but it underestimated several poor prognostic features. Addition of BAP1 for clear cell renal cell carcinoma may increase prognostic accuracy. If validated, routine incorporation of BAP1 immunohistochemistry in clear cell renal cell carcinoma biopsies may refine prognosis and aid in the selection of patients for active surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.