ArticlePloS one2021
Data management and sharing: Practices and perceptions of psychology researchers.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital transformation in laboratory documentation: Insights from an eLabFTW case study and a survey-informed onboarding framework.PloS one · 2026Article
- Beliefs about social dynamics and open science.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Opening the black box of article retractions: exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Editorial for Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Investigation of research quality and transparency in neurosurgery through the utilization of open science practices.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- A survey of experimental stimulus presentation code sharing in major areas of psychology.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Cardiology researchers' practices and perceived barriers to open science: an international survey.Open heart · 2024Article
- Addressing researcher fraud: retrospective, real-time, and preventive strategies-including legal points and data management that prevents fraud.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2024Article
- Article
- Ten simple rules for starting FAIR discussions in your community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals.The British journal of social psychology · 2023Article
- Data sharing and re-use in the traumatic stress field: An international survey of trauma researchers.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2023Article
- Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Data management strategy for a collaborative research center.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Data sharing and data governance in sub-Saharan Africa: Perspectives from researchers and scientists engaged in data-intensive research.South African journal of scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research data is increasingly viewed as an important scholarly output. While a growing body of studies have investigated researcher practices and perceptions related to data sharing, information about data-related practices throughout the research process (including data collection and analysis) remains largely anecdotal. Building on our previous study of data practices in neuroimaging research, we conducted a survey of data management practices in the field of psychology. Our survey included questions about the type(s) of data collected, the tools used for data analysis, practices related to data organization, maintaining documentation, backup procedures, and long-term archiving of research materials. Our results demonstrate the complexity of managing and sharing data in psychology. Data is collected in multifarious forms from human participants, analyzed using a range of software tools, and archived in formats that may become obsolete. As individuals, our participants demonstrated relatively good data management practices, however they also indicated that there was little standardization within their research group. Participants generally indicated that they were willing to change their current practices in light of new technologies, opportunities, or requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.