Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019479›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Implementing social prescribing in primary care in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: process evaluation of the 'Deep End' community Links Worker Programme.

Nai Rui Chng, Katie Hawkins, Bridie Fitzpatrick, Catherine A O'Donnell, Mhairi Mackenzie, Sally Wyke, Stewart W Mercer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding How, Why and for Whom Link Work Interventions Promote Access in Community Healthcare Settings in the United Kingdom: A Realist Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  12. Social prescription for the elderly: a community-based scoping review.Primary health care research & development · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Implementation and impact of a social prescribing intervention: an ethnographic exploration.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nai Rui ChngInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Katie HawkinsUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Bridie FitzpatrickInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Catherine A O'DonnellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Mhairi MackenzieInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Sally WykeInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Stewart W MercerUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial prescribing involving primary care-based 'link workers' is a key UK health policy that aims to reduce health inequalities. However, the process of implementation of the link worker approach has received little attention despite this being central to the desired impact and outcomes.

aimTo explore the implementation process of such an approach in practice. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative process evaluation of the 'Deep End' Links Worker Programme (LWP) over a 2-year period, in seven general practices in deprived areas of Glasgow.

methodThe study used thematic analysis to identify the extent of LWP integration in each practice and the key factors associated with implementation. Analysis was informed by normalisation process theory (NPT).

resultsOnly three of the seven practices fully integrated the LWP into routine practice within 2 years, based on the NPT constructs of coherence, cognitive participation, and collective action. Compared with 'partially integrated practices', 'fully integrated practices' had better shared understanding of the programme among staff, higher staff engagement with the LWP, and were implementing all aspects of the LWP at patient, practice, and community levels of intervention. Successful implementation was associated with GP buy-in, collaborative leadership, good team dynamics, link worker support, and the absence of competing innovations.

conclusionEven in a well-resourced government-funded programme, the majority of practices involved had not fully integrated the LWP within the first 2 years. Implementing social prescribing and link workers within primary care at scale is unlikely to be a 'quick fix' for mitigating health inequalities in deprived areas.

Indexed as

General PracticePrimary Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansLeadershipQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic Factorscommunity link workerscomplex interventionsgeneral practicehealthcare inequalitiesprimary caresocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID34019479
PMCPMC8463130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.