ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
MYC Copy Number Detection in Clinical Samples Using a Digital DNA-Hybridization and Detection Method.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical tumor specimens are routinely formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) in Pathology departments worldwide. FFPE blocks are convenient, long-term stable, and easy to archive and manipulate. However, nucleic acids extracted from FFPE tissues generally show a high degree of fragmentation as well as chemical modifications, mainly due to the fixation process. Methods to determine copy number alterations (CNAs) from FFPE clinical samples have proven challenging, in the fact that they are low-plex, only able to profile single genes or gene clusters (such as in situ hybridization-based methods), and/or show a low degree of robustness with partially degraded samples (array-based, NGS-based) as well as being time-consuming, costly, and with limitations in resolution. The NanoString nCounter
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.