Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019241›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2021

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Indian patients- Is the scenario different?

Viniyendra Pamecha, Piyush K Sinha, Vivek Rajendran, Nilesh S Patil, Nihar Mohapatra, Archana Rastogi, Yashwant Patidar, Ashok Choudhury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Viniyendra PamechaDepartment of Hepato Pancreato Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India. viniyendra@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9552-7782
Piyush K SinhaDepartment of Hepato Pancreato Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Vivek RajendranDepartment of Hepato Pancreato Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Nilesh S PatilDepartment of Hepato Pancreato Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Nihar MohapatraDepartment of Hepato Pancreato Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Archana RastogiDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Yashwant PatidarDepartment of Intervention Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Ashok ChoudhuryDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110 070, India.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving donor liver transplant (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial in terms of selection and outcome. We share our experience of LDLT for HCC in Indian patients.

methodsRetrospective analysis of patients undergoing LDLT for HCC discovered either preoperatively or incidentally on explant pathology was done. Preoperative characteristics and explant histopathology findings were recorded. Overall, recurrence-free survival and factors predicting recurrence were analyzed.

resultsSix hundred and eleven LDLT were performed between June 2011 and October 2019. HCC constituted 6.5% (n = 53) of transplant activity. Forty had preoperative diagnosis, while 13 were detected incidentally. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 18 for patients with HCC. Only in 10 patients (19%), HCC was the primary indication for liver transplant (LT), and the rest had undergone transplant for progressive decompensation. Thirty-two patients were within up-to-7, while 21 were outside up-to-7 criteria. Overall 5-year survival was 85.4% and recurrence-free survival was 83.3% after a median follow-up of 35 months (13-59). This was similar to LDLT for other indications (81.2% at 5 years). Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score was best able to predict recurrence (p = 0.03) with odds ratio of 6.8.

conclusionPatients with HCC in India present late for liver transplant. Most patients have some form of decompensation before they undergo LT. In selected patients, overall survival was comparable with other indications for LDLT with acceptable recurrence rates. RETREAT score was best to predict recurrence.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularEnd Stage Liver DiseaseLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationHumansLiving DonorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexChemoembolizationCirrhosisHepatitis B virusHepatitis C virusIndian seriesMortalityPortal vein thrombosisRadiofrequency ablationRecurrence-free survivalRecurrence of HCCViral hepatitis

Identifiers

PMID34019241
OpenAlexW3160178839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.