Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2021
Optic nerve sheath fenestration in leukemic patients having increased intracranial pressure: a prospective clinical trial.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic transconjunctival optic nerve sheath fenestration for progressive idiopathic visual field deficit: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) in leukemic children having increased intracranial pressure with severe uncontrolled visual loss on medical treatment and not eligible for venous sinus stenting.
methodsIn this non-randomized clinical trial, we included patients presenting with severe sight-threatening papilledema due to increased intracranial pressure following leukemia treatment. All included patients were subjected to a complete history taking, assessment of the visual acuity and fundus examination with fundus photography and grading of papilledema using Frisen scale. Patients were evaluated at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperative by recording the best-corrected visual acuity, assessment of the pupillary reaction and fundus examination and fundus photography with grading of papilledema.
resultsAmong 20 patients included in this study, there was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity of both eyes in all patients. The mean postoperative visual acuity was 0.28 ± 0.10 two weeks after surgery in the right eye and it was 0.42 ± 0.16 in the left eye. The mean visual acuity in the right eye three months after surgery was 0.78 ± 0.19 and it was 0.87 ± 0.17 in the left eye. Three months postoperatively, papilledema resolved completely in both eyes. There were no recorded ocular complications.
conclusionIn this study, ONSF was sight-saving procedure in all leukemic patients with a significant improvement in the visual acuity, stabilization of the visual function and resolving of the papilledema over follow-up period. There were no recorded intraoperative or postoperative complications. Further well-designed studies are needed to assert upon these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.