Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019113›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Optimisation of xylanases production by two Cellulomonas strains and their use for biomass deconstruction.

Ornella M Ontañon, Soma Bedő, Silvina Ghio, Mercedes M Garrido, Juliana Topalian, Dóra Jahola, Anikó Fehér, Maria Pia Valacco, Eleonora Campos, Csaba Fehér

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inoculation of the fungi-staticFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimization of xylanase production by Pichia kudriavzevii and Candida tropicalis isolated from the wood product workshop.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ornella M OntañonInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), De los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, B1686IGC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Soma BedőBiorefinery Research Group, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BUTE), Szent Gellért tér 4, Budapest, H-1111, Hungary.
Silvina GhioInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), De los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, B1686IGC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mercedes M GarridoInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), De los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, B1686IGC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juliana TopalianInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), De los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, B1686IGC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Dóra JaholaBiorefinery Research Group, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BUTE), Szent Gellért tér 4, Budapest, H-1111, Hungary.
Anikó FehérBiorefinery Research Group, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BUTE), Szent Gellért tér 4, Budapest, H-1111, Hungary.
Maria Pia ValaccoCentro de Estudios Químicos y Biológicos por Espectrometría de Masa (CEQUIBIEM-FCEN), Departamento de Química Biológica Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA-IQUIBICEN), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eleonora CamposInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), De los Reseros y N. Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, B1686IGC, Buenos Aires, Argentina. campos.eleonora@inta.gob.ar.
Csaba FehérBiorefinery Research Group, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BUTE), Szent Gellért tér 4, Budapest, H-1111, Hungary. feher.csaba@vbk.bme.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5659-5985
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HU

Funding

Higher Education Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities (HU) TKP2020 IES, Grant No. BME-IE-BIONemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal TÉT_15_ARNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal TNN_16-123305Secretary of Science and Technology of Argentina ANCYP PICT2016-4695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main distinguishing features of bacteria belonging to the Cellulomonas genus is their ability to secrete multiple polysaccharide degrading enzymes. However, their application in biomass deconstruction still constitutes a challenge. We addressed the optimisation of the xylanolytic activities in extracellular enzymatic extracts of Cellulomonas sp. B6 and Cellulomonas fimi B-402 for their subsequent application in lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by culture in several substrates. As demonstrated by secretomic profiling, wheat bran and waste paper resulted to be suitable inducers for the secretion of xylanases of Cellulomonas sp. B6 and C. fimi B-402, respectively. Both strains showed high xylanolytic activity in culture supernatant although Cellulomonas sp. B6 was the most efficient xylanolytic strain. Upscaling from flasks to fermentation in a bench scale bioreactor resulted in equivalent production of extracellular xylanolytic enzymatic extracts and freeze drying was a successful method for concentration and conservation of the extracellular enzymes, retaining 80% activity. Moreover, enzymatic cocktails composed of combined extra and intracellular extracts effectively hydrolysed the hemicellulose fraction of extruded barley straw into xylose and xylooligosaccharides. KEY POINTS: • Secreted xylanase activity of Cellulomonas sp. B6 and C. fimi was maximised. • Biomass-induced extracellular enzymes were identified by proteomic profiling. • Combinations of extra and intracellular extracts were used for barley straw hydrolysis.

Indexed as

CellulomonasBiomassEndo-1,4-beta XylanasesHydrolysisProteomicsEndo-1,4-beta XylanasesCellulomonasEnzymatic hydrolysisLignocelluloseLyophilisationSecretome analysisWaste valorisation

Identifiers

PMID34019113
PMCPMC8195749
OpenAlexW3161500968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.