Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34019084›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Long-term Intake of Gluten and Cognitive Function Among US Women.

Yiqing Wang, Benjamin Lebwohl, Raaj Mehta, Yin Cao, Peter H R Green, Francine Grodstein, Manol Jovani, Paul Lochhead, Olivia I Okereke, Laura Sampson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Celiac Disease and the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Gluten Intake and Risk of Digestive System Cancers in 3 Large Prospective Cohort Studies.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Dietary Insights in Neurological Diseases.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yiqing WangClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Benjamin LebwohlCeliac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Raaj MehtaClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Yin CaoDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Peter H R GreenCeliac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Francine GrodsteinRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Manol JovaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Paul LochheadClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Olivia I OkerekeChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura SampsonDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Walter C WillettChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Qi SunChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew T ChanClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USColumbia University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gluten avoidance has been suggested as having a benefit to cognitive health among the general population, given the link between gluten and cognitive impairment in patients with celiac disease. However, data are lacking in individuals without celiac disease. Objective: To examine whether gluten intake is associated with cognitive function in women without celiac disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included US women who participated in the longitudinal, population-based Nurses' Health Study II and had not previously or subsequently been diagnosed with celiac disease. Dietary data were collected from 1991 to 2015, and data on cognitive function were collected from 2014 to 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2020 to April 2021. Exposures: Energy-adjusted gluten intake, cumulatively averaged across questionnaire cycles prior to cognitive assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three standardized cognitive scores assessed by the validated Cogstate Brief Battery: (1) psychomotor speed and attention score, (2) learning and working memory score, and (3) global cognition score. Higher scores indicated better performance. Results: The cohort included 13 494 women (mean [SD] age, 60.6 [4.6] years). The mean (SD) gluten intake was 6.3 (1.6) g/d. After controlling for demographic and lifestyle risk factors in linear regression, no significant differences in standardized cognitive scores (mean [SD], 0 [1]) by quintile of gluten intake were found across highest and lowest quintiles of gluten intake (psychomotor speed and attention: -0.02; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.03; P for trend = .22; learning and working memory: 0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.07; P for trend = .30; global cognition: -0.002; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.05; P for trend = .78). The null associations persisted after additional adjustment for major sources of dietary gluten (ie, refined grains or whole grains), comparing decile categories of gluten intake, using gluten intake updated at each previous questionnaire cycle, or modeling changes in gluten intake. Similarly, these associations were not materially altered in sensitivity analyses that excluded women who had reported cancer or dementia diagnosis or had not completed all dietary assessments. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, long-term gluten intake was not associated with cognitive scores in middle-aged women without celiac disease. Our results do not support recommendations to restrict dietary gluten to maintain cognitive function in the absence of celiac disease or established gluten sensitivity.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCognitionCohort StudiesFemaleGlutensHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesGlutens

Identifiers

PMID34019084
PMCPMC8140370
OpenAlexW3161917176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.