ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2021
Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC).Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Initiation of a global consortium to study the progression of age-related macular degeneration: RIMR AMD consortium report # 1.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Article
- Structuring integration for patient-centered care: a review-informed ontology-driven modular front-end framework for digital health innovation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The ethics of data mining in healthcare: challenges, frameworks, and future directions.BioData mining · 2025Review
- Enhancing patient care: pharmacotherapeutic monitoring in community pharmacies - a literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The Self-Sovereign Patient as a Cornerstone of Healthcare 4.0.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2025Article
- Towards Integrated and Quality-assured Health Service Delivery: Making a Case for Health Smart Card in the Philippines.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
- Application of AI in the identification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis based on pathological, radiological, and genetic variation features.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- A Critical Review of the Prospect of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Development and evaluation of a low-cost database solution for the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) database.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- In-hospital mortality, readmission, and prolonged length of stay risk prediction leveraging historical electronic patient records.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine Research: A New Frontier.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ethical Considerations and Equipoise in Cancer Surgery.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey.Pattern recognition · 2024Article
- Enhancing data practices for Whole Health: Strategies for a transformative future.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Review
- Nuclear Cardiology in the Era of Precision Medicine: Tailoring Treatment to the Individual Patient.Cureus · 2024Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Depression and Anxiety: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient data have conventionally been thought to be well protected by the privacy laws outlined in the United States. The increasing interest of for-profit companies in acquiring the databases of large health care systems poses new challenges to the protection of patients' privacy. It also raises ethical concerns of sharing patient data with entities that may exploit it for commercial interests and even target vulnerable populations. Recognizing that every breach in the confidentiality of large databases exposes millions of patients to the potential of being exploited is important in framing new rules for governing the sharing of patient data. Similarly, the ethical aspects of data voluntarily and altruistically provided by patients for research, which may be exploited for commercial interests due to patient data sharing between health care entities and third-party companies, need to be addressed. The rise of technologies such as artificial intelligence and the availability of personal data gleaned by data vendor companies place American patients at risk of being exploited both intentionally and inadvertently because of the sharing of their data by their health care provider institutions and third-party entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.