Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34018964›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Advantages and Challenges in Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Protocol for a Systematic Mixed Studies Review.

Simen A Steindal, Andréa Aparecida Goncalves Nes, Tove E Godskesen, Susanne Lind, Alfhild Dhle, Anette Winger, Jane Österlind, Fredrik Solvang Pettersen, Heidi Holmen, Anna Klarare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Technology to Support Older Adults in Home Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simen A SteindalLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-8900
Andréa Aparecida Goncalves NesLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-1401
Tove E GodskesenDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-6740
Susanne LindDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-2741
Alfhild DhleDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-493X
Anette WingerDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-9698
Jane ÖsterlindDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-1939
Fredrik Solvang PettersenLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2589-631X
Heidi HolmenDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-7813
Anna KlarareDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-3260
Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOMarie Cederschiöld University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the increasing number of people in need of palliative care services and the current health care professional workforce strain, providing equitable, quality palliative care has become a challenge. Telehealth could be an innovative approach to palliative care delivery, enabling patients to spend more time or even remain at home, if they wish, throughout the illness trajectory. However, no previous systematic mixed studies reviews have synthesized evidence on patients' experiences of the advantages and challenges of telehealth for home-based palliative care.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic mixed studies review is to critically appraise and synthesize findings from studies that investigated patients' use of telehealth in home-based palliative care with a focus on the advantages and challenges experienced by the patients.

methodsThis article describes the protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with a convergent design. The reporting will be guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. A systematic search was performed in eight databases for studies published from January 2010 to June 2020. The search will be updated in 2021. Pairs of authors will independently assess eligibility, extract data, and assess methodological quality. The data will then be analyzed using thematic synthesis.

resultsWe describe the rationale and design of a systematic mixed studies review. The database searches were performed on June 25, 2020. Assessment of eligibility and further steps have not yet been performed. Results are anticipated by August 2021.

conclusionsFollowing the ethos of patient-centered palliative care, this systematic mixed studies review could lead to recommendations for practice and policy, enabling the development and implementation of telehealth applications and services that align with patients' preferences and needs at home. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/22626.

Indexed as

eHealthhealth care technologyhome-basedpalliative carereviewsystematic mixed studies reviewtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34018964
PMCPMC8178736
OpenAlexW3154594486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.