Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34018951›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of medical ethics

Centring patient autonomy in DNAR decisions.

Olinda Timms, Sunil K Pandya, Amar Jesani, Sandhya Srinivasan

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of medical ethics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olinda TimmsDivision of Health and Humanities, St Johns Research Institute, Bengaluru 560 034 INDIA.
Sunil K PandyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Dr GV Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai 400 026 INDIA.
Amar JesaniIndependent Consultant, Researcher and Teacher in Bioethics and Public Health, Swatantrya Sainik Nagar, Andheri West, Mumbai 400 058 INDIA.
Sandhya SrinivasanIndependent Journalist, 8, Sea Doll, Chimbai, Bandra West, Mumbai 400 050, INDIA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Response from the ICMR team of Dr Mani et al (1) to the IJME Editorial (2) on the ICMR DNAR Guidelines (3) provides some answers to the gaps and questions raised, and it is hoped that these will find a place in revised versions of the document. The document Disclaimer said "further revisions" were planned, based on perceptions and experiences of clinicians and the public; an early revision will allow for better acceptance of the Guidelines.

Indexed as

Resuscitation OrdersHumans

Identifiers

PMID34018951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.