Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34018665›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2021

A retrospective analysis of 122 immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with dapsone: Efficacy, safety and factors associated with treatment response.

Marina P Colella, Fernanda A Orsi, Elizio C F Alves, Gabriela de F Delmoro, Gabriela G Yamaguti-Hayakawa, Erich V de Paula, Joyce M Annichino-Bizzacchi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 Molecular Pathophysiology: Acetylation of Repurposing Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina P ColellaUniversity of Campinas, Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5942-1083
Fernanda A OrsiUniversity of Campinas, Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, Campinas, Brazil.
Elizio C F AlvesUniversity of Campinas, Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, Campinas, Brazil.
Gabriela de F DelmoroFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Gabriela G Yamaguti-HayakawaUniversity of Campinas, Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, Campinas, Brazil.
Erich V de PaulaUniversity of Campinas, Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1539-7912
Joyce M Annichino-BizzacchiUniversity of Campinas, Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimum second-line treatment or best sequence of treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are yet to be determined. Our institution has accumulated extensive experience regarding the use of dapsone as second-line therapy for ITP.

objectivesWe aimed to assess the efficacy rate and safety of dapsone treatment in ITP patients. PATIENTS/

methodsHere we report our experience in a retrospective study, including 122 patients, with a median treatment duration with dapsone of 6 months and a median follow-up period of 3.4 years.

resultsThe overall response rate in this cohort was 66%, including 24% of complete responses. Among responders, in 24% a relapse occurred while on treatment. Therefore, a sustained response was observed in 51% of patients. Interestingly, 81% of the responders maintained the response after the interruption of treatment, for a median time of 26 months. Side effects were reported in 16% of the patients in this cohort and treatment was interrupted due to side effects in 11% of patients. The main cause in these cases was hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. Reductions in hemoglobin levels during the use of dapsone were seen in 94% of the patients. Responders presented significantly greater reductions in their hemoglobin levels than nonresponders did: median hemoglobin drop of 1.9 g/dl vs. 1.2 g/dl (p = .004).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that dapsone has adequate efficacy and is well tolerated. Although the mechanism of action is still unclear, our observation that the degree in the drop of hemoglobin is greater in responders suggest a possible role of the blockage of the reticuloendothelial system in the therapeutic effect of the drug.

Indexed as

DapsonePurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicHumansRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSplenectomyTreatment OutcomeDapsonedapsonehemolysisimmune thrombocytopeniamethemoglobinemiasplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID34018665
PMCPMC8456876
OpenAlexW3162398273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.