Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34018180›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2021

Myological variation in the forearm anatomy of Callitrichidae and Lemuridae.

Edwin Dickinson, Marissa L Boettcher, Madison R Smith, Nikole A Worden, Sidney R Swindell, Jason S Seelye, Francisco Pastor, Adam Hartstone-Rose

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Forearm muscles in the black lion tamarin (Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edwin DickinsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-6677
Marissa L BoettcherDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Madison R SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0482-7315
Nikole A WordenDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Sidney R SwindellDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Jason S SeelyeDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Francisco PastorDepartamento de Anatomia y Radiologia, Universidad de Valladolid, Museo Anatomico, Valladolid, Spain.
Adam Hartstone-RoseDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-5573
North Carolina State University · USUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anatomy of the primate forearm is frequently investigated in terms of locomotor mode, substrate use, and manual dexterity. Such studies typically rely upon broad, interspecific samples for which one or two representative taxa are used to characterize the anatomy of their genus or family. To interpret variation between distantly related taxa, however, it is necessary to contextualize these differences by quantifying variation at lower hierarchical levels, that is, more fine-grained representation within specific genera or families. In this study, we present a focused evaluation of the variation in muscle organization, integration, and architecture within two speciose primate families: the Callitrichidae and Lemuridae. We demonstrate that, within each lineage, several muscle functional groups exhibit substantial variation in muscle organization. Most notably, the digital extensors appear highly variable (particularly among callitrichids), with many unique configurations represented. In terms of architectural variables, both families are more conservative, with the exception of the genus Callimico-for which an increase is observed in forearm muscle mass and strength. We suggest this reflects the increased use of vertical climbing and trunk-to-trunk leaping within this genus relative to the more typically fine-branch substrate use of the other callitrichids. Overall, these data emphasize the underappreciated variation in forearm myology and suggest that overly generalized typification of a taxon's anatomy may conceal significant intraspecific and intrageneric variation therein. Thus, considerations of adaptation within the forearm musculature should endeavor to consider the full range of anatomical variation when making comparisons between multiple taxa within an evolutionary context.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsCallitrichinaeForearmLemuridaeLocomotionMuscle, Skeletaldexterityfascicle lengthmusclePCSAprimate

Identifiers

PMID34018180
PMCPMC8349451
OpenAlexW3162489931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.