Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34018111›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Bioremediation assessment, hematological, and biochemical responses of the earthworm (Allolobophora caliginosa) in soil contaminated with crude oil.

Safaa Ezzat Nassar, Radwa Mohamed Said

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Safaa Ezzat NassarZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. safaaezat@zu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-0584
Radwa Mohamed SaidZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil contamination with crude oil is a major environmental problem. The aim of this study was to assess whether the earthworm Allolobophora caliginosa could improve the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons while enriching soils that were contaminated with crude oil. In addition, the toxic effects of crude oil on earthworms during bioremediation will be assessed. The soil samples were experimentally contaminated with two different quantities of light crude oil 5 or 7.5 ml for 60 days. Activities of A. caliginosa resulted in 33.56% and 54.98% total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) losses from the soil contaminated with 5 ml of crude oil after 22 and 60 days; respectively. While in 7.5 ml crude oil-contaminated soil, there was a loss of 32.24% and 71.05% of TPH over the same period of time. During the experiment, however, there were no signs of improvement in soil physicochemical properties. Earthworm tissue analyses at the end of the experiment showed significant bioaccumulation of petroleum hydrocarbons in their tissues and changes in their metabolic and hematological parameters. Earthworms exposed to crude oil showed a significant increase in protein, malondialdehyde, and glutathione but decreased in catalase levels and total antioxidant capacity compared to control earthworm after 60 days of exposure. There was a significant decrease in the Hgb, RBC

Indexed as

OligochaetaPetroleumAnimalsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalSoilPetroleumSoilAllolobophora caliginosaAntioxidant parametersBioremediationCrude oilEarthwormHematological parameters

Identifiers

PMID34018111
OpenAlexW3162852769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.