ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Delayed brain development of Rolandic epilepsy profiled by deep learning-based neuroanatomic imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mapping Individualized Dual-Axis Network Topology in Focal Epilepsy: Divergent Alterations in System Integrity, Integration, and Clinical Correlates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Structure-function interrelationships and associated neurotransmitter profiles in drug-naïve benign childhood epilepsy with central-temporal spikes patients.European radiology · 2025Article
- Combined diffusion tensor imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping to characterize normal-appearing white matter in self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Perisylvian and Hippocampal Anomalies in Individuals With PathogenicNeurology. Genetics · 2024Article
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping shows lower brain iron content in children with childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Predicting Antiseizure Medication Treatment in Children with Rare Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Related Epilepsy Using Deep Learning.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Atypical functional connectivity hierarchy in Rolandic epilepsy.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Imaging Genetics in Epilepsy: Current Knowledge and New Perspectives.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Predicting brain age during typical and atypical development based on structural and functional neuroimaging.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAlthough Rolandic epilepsy (RE) has been regarded as a brain developmental disorder, neuroimaging studies have not yet ascertained whether RE has brain developmental delay. This study employed deep learning-based neuroanatomic biomarker to measure the changed feature of "brain age" in RE.
methodsThe study constructed a 3D-CNN brain age prediction model through 1155 cases of typically developing children's morphometric brain MRI from open-source datasets and further applied to a local dataset of 167 RE patients and 107 typically developing children. The brain-predicted age difference was measured to quantitatively estimate brain age changes in RE and further investigated the relevancies with cognitive and clinical variables.
resultsThe brain age estimation network model presented a good performance for brain age prediction in typically developing children. The children with RE showed a 0.45-year delay of brain age by contrast with typically developing children. Delayed brain age was associated with neuroanatomic changes in the Rolandic regions and also associated with cognitive dysfunction of attention.
conclusionThis study provided neuroimaging evidence to support the notion that RE has delayed brain development. KEY POINTS: • The children with Rolandic epilepsy showed imaging phenotypes of delayed brain development with increased GM volume and decreased WM volume in the Rolandic regions. • The children with Rolandic epilepsy had a 0.45-year delay of brain-predicted age by comparing with typically developing children, using 3D-CNN-based brain age prediction model. • The delayed brain age was associated with morphometric changes in the Rolandic regions and attentional deficit in Rolandic epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.