SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2021
Routine prefeed gastric aspiration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of olfactory and/or gustatory stimuli on feeding of preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Early total enteral feeding versus conventional incremental feeding in preterm infants weighing 1000-1250 g: a single-center open-label randomized controlled trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Article
- Development of the preterm infant gut and gastric residuals microbiome.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Application of nasojejunal nutrition tube after surgery for congenital gastric wall muscle layer defect in neonates.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Practice of Routine Monitoring of Gastric Residual in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis Article.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nursing practice of routine gastric aspiration in preterm infants and its link to necrotizing enterocolitis: is the practice still clinically relevant?BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Predictors of time to full enteral feeding in low birth weight neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective follow up study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Ventilation and Rapid Enteral Feeding Advances in Preterm Infants-2-Year Follow-Up of the STENA-Cohort.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Effect of selective gastric residual monitoring on enteral intake in preterm infants.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite lack of evidence, the practice of routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration before the next feed is common. Recent studies suggest that this practice might be even harmful. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of avoiding routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration as compared to routine aspiration, on various clinical outcomes in preterm infants. We searched five different electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) until March 8, 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing the practice of routine prefeed gastric aspiration with no routine aspiration in preterm infants were considered eligible. The random-effects meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3 software. Of the 894 unique records identified by our search, we included 6 studies (451 participants) in the review. There was no significant difference in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.31 to 2.08; 421 participants in 5 trials). Avoiding routine prefeed aspiration was associated with achieving full enteral feeds earlier (MD - 3.19 days, 95% CI - 4.22 to - 2.16), shorter duration of hospitalization (MD - 5.32 days; 95% CI - 10.25 to - 0.38), and lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99). Time to regain birth weight, days of total parenteral nutrition or central venous line usage, culture-positive sepsis, and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups.Conclusion: In the absence of other signs of feed intolerance, routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration should be avoided in preterm infants.Prospero registration number: CRD42020197657 What is Known: • Though, routine prefeed aspiration before next feed is a common practice in preterm gavage-fed infants. • Recent study suggests that the omission of routine gastric residual evaluation led to improved weight gain and earlier hospital discharge. What is New: • Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggest that avoiding routine prefeed gastric residue monitoring helps in the reduction of late-onset sepsis, achieving full enteral feeds earlier, and earlier discharge from the hospital. • Abandoning the practice of routine prefeed aspiration in absence of other signs of feed intolerance in preterm low birthweight neonates is safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.