Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34018044›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Routine prefeed gastric aspiration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jogender Kumar, Jitendra Meena, Piyush Mittal, Jeeva Shankar, Praveen Kumar, Arvind Shenoi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jogender KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Jitendra MeenaDepartment of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Piyush MittalDepartment of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Jeeva ShankarDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Praveen KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India. drpkumarpgi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4742-8787
Arvind ShenoiDepartment of Pediatrics, Cloudnine Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCloudnine · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite lack of evidence, the practice of routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration before the next feed is common. Recent studies suggest that this practice might be even harmful. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of avoiding routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration as compared to routine aspiration, on various clinical outcomes in preterm infants. We searched five different electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) until March 8, 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing the practice of routine prefeed gastric aspiration with no routine aspiration in preterm infants were considered eligible. The random-effects meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3 software. Of the 894 unique records identified by our search, we included 6 studies (451 participants) in the review. There was no significant difference in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.31 to 2.08; 421 participants in 5 trials). Avoiding routine prefeed aspiration was associated with achieving full enteral feeds earlier (MD - 3.19 days, 95% CI - 4.22 to - 2.16), shorter duration of hospitalization (MD - 5.32 days; 95% CI - 10.25 to - 0.38), and lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99). Time to regain birth weight, days of total parenteral nutrition or central venous line usage, culture-positive sepsis, and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups.Conclusion: In the absence of other signs of feed intolerance, routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration should be avoided in preterm infants.Prospero registration number: CRD42020197657 What is Known: • Though, routine prefeed aspiration before next feed is a common practice in preterm gavage-fed infants. • Recent study suggests that the omission of routine gastric residual evaluation led to improved weight gain and earlier hospital discharge. What is New: • Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggest that avoiding routine prefeed gastric residue monitoring helps in the reduction of late-onset sepsis, achieving full enteral feeds earlier, and earlier discharge from the hospital. • Abandoning the practice of routine prefeed aspiration in absence of other signs of feed intolerance in preterm low birthweight neonates is safe.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingInfant, PrematureBirth WeightEnteral NutritionHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornFeed intoleranceGastric aspiratesLow birthweightNecrotizing enterocolitisNutrition

Identifiers

PMID34018044
OpenAlexW3162053677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.