Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017947›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2021

Current Issues and Technical Advances in Cultured Meat Production: A Review.

Tae Kyung Hong, Dong-Min Shin, Joonhyuk Choi, Jeong Tae Do, Sung Gu Han

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transforming meat waste into sustainable corneal keratoplasty models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tae Kyung HongDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, KU Institute of Science and Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2266
Dong-Min ShinDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-433X
Joonhyuk ChoiDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, KU Institute of Science and Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7677-5978
Jeong Tae DoDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, KU Institute of Science and Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6721-1441
Sung Gu HanDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-861X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global population grows, we need a stable protein supply to meet the demands. Although plant-derived protein sources are widely available, animal meat maintains its popularity as a high-quality and savory protein source. Recently, cultured meat, also known as

Indexed as

alternative protein sourcescultured meatin vitro meatlivestock farmingmyogenic satellite cells

Identifiers

PMID34017947
PMCPMC8112310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.