Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34017826›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Calibration of a Heterogeneous Brain Model Using a Subject-Specific Inverse Finite Element Approach.

J Sebastian Giudice, Ahmed Alshareef, Taotao Wu, Andrew K Knutsen, Lucy V Hiscox, Curtis L Johnson, Matthew B Panzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multimodal characterization of intracranial biomechanics in a 3D biofidelic head surrogate.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. An MRI-derived head-neck finite element model.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J Sebastian GiudiceCenter for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Ahmed AlshareefDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Taotao WuCenter for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Andrew K KnutsenCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Lucy V HiscoxDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Curtis L JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Matthew B PanzerCenter for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Delaware · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

MRI Measurement of the Mechanical Vulnerability of the BrainU01NS112120 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS112120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central to the investigation of the biomechanics of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the assessment of injury risk from head impact are finite element (FE) models of the human brain. However, many existing FE human brain models have been developed with simplified representations of the parenchyma, which may limit their applicability as an injury prediction tool. Recent advances in neuroimaging techniques and brain biomechanics provide new and necessary experimental data that can improve the biofidelity of FE brain models. In this study, the CAB-20MSym template model was developed, calibrated, and extensively verified. To implement material heterogeneity, a magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) template image was leveraged to define the relative stiffness gradient of the brain model. A multi-stage inverse FE (iFE) approach was used to calibrate the material parameters that defined the underlying non-linear deviatoric response by minimizing the error between model-predicted brain displacements and experimental displacement data. This process involved calibrating the infinitesimal shear modulus of the material using low-severity, low-deformation impact cases and the material non-linearity using high-severity, high-deformation cases from a dataset of

Indexed as

image registrationmagneticresonance elastographymaterial propertiesmorphingtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34017826
PMCPMC8129184
OpenAlexW3159461684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.