ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The clinical value of comprehensive nursing intervention in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and prediction model for carbapenem-resistant organism infection in sepsis patients.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Impact of proactive risk-prevention nursing interventions on the recovery of ICU patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in children with respiratory failure.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- The effect of ventilator-associated pneumonia on the prognosis of intensive care unit patients within 90 days and 180 days.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical value of comprehensive nursing intervention in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
methodsEligible 116 patients who received mechanical ventilation in our hospital from June 2018 to December 2019 were equally randomized into a control group and an observation group. The observation group adopted comprehensive nursing while conventional nursing was adopted in the control group accordingly. The mechanical ventilation time, hospitalization time, VAP incidence, psychological status, quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared.
resultsThe mechanical ventilation and hospitalization time in the observation group was shorter compared to that in the control group (
conclusionComprehensive nursing intervention can shorten the mechanical ventilation and hospitalization time, prevent the occurrence of VAP, ease the negative emotions of patients, and improve their quality of life as well as nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017575PMC8129291W3161440335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.