ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Vascular boot warming improves clinical outcomes of patients with deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVascular boot warming can increase venous return from the lower extremities, which may improve clinical outcomes of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In this study, we included vascular boot (Boot) warming in the standard of care (SOC) of patients with DVT and explored its safety and efficacy.
methodsSubjects diagnosed with acute DVT of the lower extremities were included in this study. The subjects (n=104) were then randomized into the SOC group (n=51) and the SOC + Boot group (n=53) and followed up for 3 months. All subjects received anticoagulants as standard of care. The patients in the SOC + Boot group wore vascular boots for a minimum of 3 times in a day, for 45 minutes each time for the first 14 days. Pain, swelling, major bleeding, pulmonary embolism (PE), extended proximal DVT, and mortality were evaluated at day 1, day 14 and at 3 months.
resultsCompared with the patients in the SOC group, the patients in the SOC + Boot group had a lower rate of pain (3.8±1.5 vs 5.4±0.9 by 14 days, 2.3±0.9 vs 3.1±1.2 by 3 months, all P<0.05), faster swelling reduction (circumference difference compared to day 1 at the ankle level was -0.29±0.44 cm vs 1.21±0.63 cm by 14 days, -0.45±0.43 cm vs 0.15±0.19 cm by 3 months, all P<0.05), lower incidence of PE (1.9% vs 3.9%, RR 2.0% by 14 days, 2.8% vs 5.9%, RR 3.1%, by 3 months, both P<0.05), lower incidence of proximal DVT (1.9% vs 5.9%, RR 4%, by 14 days, 3.8% vs 7.8%, RR 4% by 3 months, both P<0.05), and lower mortality (1.9% vs 3.9% by 14 days and 3 months, P<0.05). No major bleeding was observed in either group. These results suggest that implementing vascular boot warming in SOC can improve clinical outcomes in patients with lower extremity DVT.
conclusionVascular boot warming, as an add-on to SOC, is safe and effective for patients with lower extremity DVT and can help to prevent post-thrombotic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017568PMC8129304W3162659192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.