ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effects of percutaneous catheter intervention on pulmonary hemodynamic indexes and safety in elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- P(v-a)COBMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of percutaneous catheter intervention (PCI) on pulmonary hemodynamic indexes and safety in elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE).
methodsThe retrospective study was performed on 65 elderly APE patients. According to the risk classification of Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Pulmonary Thromboembolism in China, the patients were divided into the medium-high risk group (n=37) and high risk group (n=28). All patients received PCI based on thrombolysis. The clinical efficacy after treatment, and changes of pulmonary hemodynamic indexes and blood gas indexes before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, and the complications and prognosis of patients were recorded.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups after treatment (P>0.05). Compared with before operation, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), ratio of right/left ventricular end diastolic diameter (RVEDD/LVEDD) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of the two groups were significantly reduced 12 h after operation, and greater changes were observed in the high risk group (all P<0.05). Compared with before operation, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO
conclusionPCI has obvious effects in the treatment of elderly APE. It can obviously improve pulmonary blood flow dynamics and oxygenation dysfunction, especially for high-risk patients, and it has fewer postoperative complications with certain security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34017566PMC8129325W3163797545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.